Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-14 Thread Sven Burgener
Sorry to reply to my own mail, but hey, I finally got my cable connection working and I'm willing to share what I've learnt. ;-) The problems I experienced were with the method my cable provider uses to get their clients authenticated / initialized / connected. This is what happens: o

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-09 Thread Michael Soulier
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, S.Salman Ahmed wrote: I just tried installing Potato using the latest boot floppies (compact set) and had the same result - pump failed to get configuration info using DHCP. I ended up statically configuring the ethernet card in my system using the same values as

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-07 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... So, does this mean that if I try and install potato on my home system using the boot floppies (to avoid having to burn 1 or more CDs) and I select the DHCP net configuration option for doing a network/internet install that the

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-07 Thread John Reinke
I used the boot floppies, and it worked with my cable modem. I guess I didn't know it was using pump, it just worked by magic. I went ahead and installed dhcpcd when I was done. BTW, make sure you get root.bin, resc.bin, plus all three driver floppies BEFORE you start the installation and blow

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-06 Thread Andrei Ivanov
I'm on @home as well, and pump just failed badly for me. However, dhcpcd worked out of the box, so to say: dhcpcd -h XXX did the job right then. Andrei -- First there was Explorer... Then came Expedition. This summer

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-06 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... I was able to figure out the problem myself. For some reason, I was unable to get Pump to work with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] DHCP servers. I then remembered that there was another DHCP client, dhcp-client, which I have used earlier on

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-06 Thread Sven Burgener
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:30:13AM -0500, Phil Brutsche wrote: dhclient (that's the name of the executable in the dhcp-client package) is the best (imo) dhcp client for unix-type systems. That would explain why NetBSD, OpenBSD, and FreeBSD use dhclient in their bootup sequence when you select

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-06 Thread Michael Smith
Oh, no, dhcpd is the server software. That won't work at all, unless you are on contract with @home to provide this service:^) In fact, you might be handing out addresses to @home customers who wonder why it doesn't work. What they don't tell you about @home is that they use static ip

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-06 Thread John Reinke
Read Sven's message below again - dhcpcd - this is not server software. This is what I use for my cable modem connection. It worked for me before I even had a clue what I was doing! It automatically is assigned the DNS servers, etc, so all you need to do is turn it on and it works (even easier

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-06 Thread Michael Smith
Yeah, there's that, but from all the inquiring I have done, that address is pretty much unchanging. The problem I've found with @home, at least in Eugene, OR, is that they use alot of mystique to describe what they do, like it's magic or something, when all they really do is pass packets and

Re: DHCP client setup for @Home

2000-09-06 Thread Sven Burgener
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:53:19PM -0500, John Reinke wrote: Read Sven's message below again - dhcpcd - this is not server software. Yup, note the 'c' in dhcpcd. Stands for client. And the binary behaves like a daemon in the way that it disconnects from the terminal and keeps running the way