On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Dave Ewart wrote:
On Monday, 07.11.2005 at 12:10 -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
I have a new
Hi don,
I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom NetXtreme NIC) I set up
as a DHCP client. When I enable the LAN interface on it, hundreds of
lines of the following show up in the server syslog.
A BIOS upgrade on the offending PC could fix your problem - it has
helped us in the past
Hi Anthony,
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Anthony Walters wrote:
Hi don,
I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom NetXtreme NIC) I set up
as a DHCP client. When I enable the LAN interface on it, hundreds of
lines of the following show up in the server syslog.
A BIOS upgrade on the offending
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Anthony Walters wrote:
Otherwise you could use dhcpdump to see what is being sent and recieved from
the server
This worked -- I found a rogue server on the network NACKing the XP
REQUEST before the real server could ACK it. Thanks Anthony
Don
Don Hayward ISDIV
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom NetXtreme NIC) I set up
as a DHCP client. When I enable the LAN
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:10:16PM -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:10:16PM -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
I
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 04:42:07PM -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
What if you configure dhcpd to give it a fixed address?
An interesting question. That works. But what does it mean?
It basically means that the DHCP server will always issue
On Monday, 07.11.2005 at 12:10 -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:10:21PM +, Dave Ewart wrote:
On Monday, 07.11.2005 at 12:10 -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has
Am Donnerstag, den 19. Mai 2005 schrubte Michael Frank:
Ist es richtig dass ich in /etc/init.d/dhcp das Interface auf eth1
stellen muss ? So weisse ich doch den dhcpd der eth1 zu - richtig ?
Wenn, dann in /etc/default/dhcp*server.
--
) .--.
)#=+ '
/## | .+.
* Michael Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NETZWERK-1
eth0 kriegt von einem Router per Dhcp die IP
Ich nehme an, das ist ein Router in Internet. Richtig? Wenn dem so ist,
musst Du ihm eine manuelle Route (für 192.168.2.0) hinzufügen. Die musst
Du jedesmal anpassen, wenn der Router eine andere
hi,
Bin gerade dabei einen dhcp Server aufzusetzten und habe folgende
Probleme :
Situation:
Debian SID 2.6.8-2-386
NETZWERK-1
eth0 kriegt von einem Router per Dhcp die IP
NETZWERK-2
eth1 soll ueber einen dhcpd weiter IPs verteilen
Ist es richtig dass ich in /etc/init.d/dhcp das
Hi,
Michael Frank wrote:
Ist das soweit korrekt ? Ich kann doch in dem eth1 - Netz
die gleiche netmask verwenden die in dem Netz von eth0 - oder
(255.255.255.0) ?
ja, natrlich. Die Netzmaske, zusammen mit einer Adresse des Netzes,
identifiziert ein Netz.
Ich bekomme folgende Fehlermeldung
Hi,
sieht nach fehlendem Eintrag im NS aus.
Machine is dual homed?
Laeuft named ?
Gruss, Roland
On Thursday 19 May 2005 21:44, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
Hi,
Michael Frank wrote:
Ist das soweit korrekt ? Ich kann doch in dem eth1 - Netz
die gleiche netmask verwenden die in dem Netz von eth0
Hallo Michael,
Michael Frank schrieb:
subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.255;
option broadcast-address 192.168.2.255;
option routers localhost.localdomain.com;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-time 7200;
}
Sollte
16 matches
Mail list logo
