On Thu, May 14, 1998 at 09:34:45PM +, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 1998 at 04:49:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I would like to try a 2.1 kernel. Which do you recommend/Which one is the
> > most
> > stable?
>
> At this point, the latest is probably stable. I use 2.1.
On Thu, May 14, 1998 at 04:49:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would like to try a 2.1 kernel. Which do you recommend/Which one is the most
> stable?
At this point, the latest is probably stable. I use 2.1.101 and it's more
stable than 2.0.33---which on some systems isn't saying much.
p
I would like to try a 2.1 kernel. Which do you recommend/Which one is the most
stable?
Thanks,
Timothy
> AFAIK you need a 2.1 kernel to use later DOSemu versions.
>
> Adrian
>
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
> Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. PGP key avai
On Mon, May 11, 1998 at 07:24:47PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> AFAIK you need a 2.1 kernel to use later DOSemu versions.
>
I have working "out-of-the-box" dosemu 0.97.7 under 2.0.33.
--
Alexey Vyskubov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 12:22:14PM -0500, Asher Haig wrote:
> Has anyone managed to make DOSEmu 97.7 work? There doesn't seem to be a
I have working dosemu 97.7 under Linux/Debian 2.0/Kernel 2.0.33
> CONF: memcheck - Fatal error. Memory conflict!
> Memory at 0x16400:0x000
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 12:22:14PM -0500, Asher Haig wrote:
> Has anyone managed to make DOSEmu 97.7 work? There doesn't seem to be a
> .deb file, so I downloaded the source from the dosemu site. It compiled
> fine and everything in setup seemed to go fine to the point where I t
Has anyone managed to make DOSEmu 97.7 work? There doesn't seem to be a
.deb file, so I downloaded the source from the dosemu site. It compiled
fine and everything in setup seemed to go fine to the point where I tried
to run dos. Then I get this error:
CPU speed set to 167/1 MHz
Running o
7 matches
Mail list logo
