Debian's 'group' system

1997-04-08 Thread Pete Harlan
> Uhm, isn't smail finicky about the permissions on a .forward file? If it > does not trust the file, it will not obey it. This reminds me---Debian has adopted this nice system of every user having his/her own group. (No sarcasm: It's a Good Thing.) Everything is then group-writable by default,

Re: Debian's 'group' system

1997-04-08 Thread m*
Pete Harlan wrote: > > The problem is that "ssh" won't work unless you remove group-write > permissions from your home directory (and the ~/.ssh directory). > > It's either a misconfiguration with Debian (i.e., files should not be > group-writable by default) or with the ssh Debian package (i.e.,

Re: Debian's 'group' system

1997-04-09 Thread tgakem
Pete Harlan wrote: > > This reminds me---Debian has adopted this nice system of every user > having his/her own group. (No sarcasm: It's a Good Thing.) > Everything is then group-writable by default, which is probably what > you want. Can you enlighten me as to why this should be a Good Thing?

Re: Debian's 'group' system

1997-04-09 Thread Petr Barta
> > The problem is that "ssh" won't work unless you remove group-write > > permissions from your home directory (and the ~/.ssh directory). > > > > It's either a misconfiguration with Debian (i.e., files should not be > > group-writable by default) or with the ssh Debian package (i.e., it > > shou

Re: Debian's 'group' system

1997-04-09 Thread Alair Pereira do Lago
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Pete Harlan wrote: > > > > This reminds me---Debian has adopted this nice system of every user > > having his/her own group. (No sarcasm: It's a Good Thing.) I agree. It is a good thing. It is a nice system. I saw this for the first time in RedHat and I liked th