Eric Fain writes:
> Does everyone else use last? It occurs to me that maybe people who don't
> have a lot of users on their systems might not have tried last since
> upgrading to hamm.
Actually, I've never tried it before (two users). Seems to work fine,
though.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lept since
then. Anybody remember?
jim
--
From: Eric Fain[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 1998 3:14 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: The recipient's address is unknown.
Subject: Re: Debian 2.0 last, wtmp broken
Unfortunately, repeatin
Unfortunately, repeating the procedure described in autoup.sh has not been
successful.
Your operation of last doesn't sound right to me, unless you have last
aliased to something. In my case however, logging in as root does not
give me any more entries than before (zero).
Does everyone else use
It sounds as if you did changing over of wtmp and utmp correctly. I however
did
not. I actually touched wtmp and copied /dev/null to utmp before I rebooted my
newly install hamm for the first time. This gave me garbage for last. So I
redid
the steps pointed out by the upgrade FAQ, and rebo
I have 4 machines running Debian, three of which I have upgraded to 2.0
(hamm) from 1.3.1 using autoup.sh. I have followed the instructions
contained therein regarding utmp and wtmp, (repeatedly) but my last
command does not work properly on any of these machines:
"last" returns with nothing excep
5 matches
Mail list logo
