On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mostly marketing. I know
that marketing is anathema to most of us, but someone's gotta do it and
I'm afraid the task fell on
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mostly marketing. I know
that marketing is anathema to most of us, but someone's
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997 17:47:12 -0600 (MDT), Anthony Fok wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mostly marketing. I
--
From: Dave Cinege [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian Version Numbers - My rant on this
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 1997 8:20 PM
On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
So I am running Debian
The way I see it is this. On ftp.debian.org there is a directory called
bo-updates in there are all of the updates, with the changes info, that
have happened since the last major release. Ok, so here is my point, since
any changes that are done are announced via the debian-changes list why
do we
To make a too long thread even longer:
On Aug 19, Dave Cinege wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mostly marketing. I know
that marketing is anathema
6 matches
Mail list logo
