On Thu, Jun 18, 1998 at 08:27:10AM +, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
> Dock appears to do nothing but be a place to dock things to. Fiend does
> this too, but it's not glued to a side and I can't get the window manager
> to move it to an out of the way place.
you can collapse the Fiend (renamed to
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 11:15:01PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> dpk wrote:
> > I,... what are people switching to? Any recommendations for a fast,
> > slick, and easily configurable wm?
>
> WindowMaker. As a bonus, it's similar to afterstep in look & feel.
>
> To be fair, the config file for wmake
dpk wrote:
> I,... what are people switching to? Any recommendations for a fast,
> slick, and easily configurable wm?
WindowMaker. As a bonus, it's similar to afterstep in look & feel.
To be fair, the config file for wmaker hasn't quite settled down yet,
either. But you can do a lot of config s
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 05:19:45AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >I,... what are people switching to? Any recommendations for a fast,
> >slick, and easily configurable wm?
>
> Why not just stick with the 1.0 series?
Upstream bugs, no libc6 version, the package was upgraded kinda by accident
(wa
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:47:22 -0400 (EDT), dpk wrote:
>Probably just me being picky... but 1.0 series is not going to have
>maintenance or developement done on it.
Last time I read the Afterstep mailing list there were murmers of someone
picking up the 1.0 tree and maintaining it.
>I also do
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 08:15:37 -0400 (EDT), dpk wrote:
>
> >I,... what are people switching to? Any recommendations for a fast,
> >slick, and easily configurable wm?
>
> Why not just stick with the 1.0 series?
Probably just me being picky... but 1.0 s
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 08:15:37 -0400 (EDT), dpk wrote:
>I,... what are people switching to? Any recommendations for a fast,
>slick, and easily configurable wm?
Why not just stick with the 1.0 series?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> 1.4.x doesn't use .steprc, look in /usr/share for the things that go in
> ~/GNUstep/Library/Afterstep I think. And good luck configuring that mess.
> I've given up.
Join the club! I successfully configured 1.4 to function like my old
.steprc, h
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:31:59PM -0700, Phlip wrote:
> I got this version ooff your site and installed it but had problems
> making it the default manager. Also, is the file .steprc included in the
> package? I can't seem to locate it on my system and would really
> appreciate knowing where it is
I got this version ooff your site and installed it but had problems
making it the default manager. Also, is the file .steprc included in the
package? I can't seem to locate it on my system and would really
appreciate knowing where it is supposed to be so I can at least create a
new one and put it w
10 matches
Mail list logo
