Tim said:
If you think testing or unstable is suitable for production systems you are
one of
1. an idiot
2. have very limited needs/no experience
3. talking out of your ass
4. have no concept of what it means to be responsible for others' work
Even Sarge? I need something more up to date
Mitchell Laks wrote:
Tim said:
Even Sarge? I need something more up to date then woody, for my postgresql and
need the integration that sarge provides, vs backports + woody. Is Sarge that
dangerous on 12/26/2004? I want others opinions. I have 2 servers running
sarge 24/7 right now (for last 3
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Mitchell Laks wrote:
Even Sarge? I need something more up to date then woody, for my postgresql
and
need the integration that sarge provides, vs backports + woody. Is Sarge that
dangerous on 12/26/2004?
I've been running sarge on three production servers and one home
Mitchell Laks wrote:
Tim said:
If you think testing or unstable is suitable for production systems you are
one of
1. an idiot
2. have very limited needs/no experience
3. talking out of your ass
4. have no concept of what it means to be responsible for others' work
Even Sarge? I need something more
On Monday 27 December 2004 12:32 am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
I think the issue is that packages are not directly uploaded to testing.
So it is possible to have version X of package A installed in testing.
...
If a serious or grave bug is filed, the package simply will not make it
into testing.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:54:01AM -0500, Mitchell Laks wrote:
On Monday 27 December 2004 12:32 am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
I think the issue is that packages are not directly uploaded to testing.
So it is possible to have version X of package A installed in testing.
...
If a serious or
6 matches
Mail list logo
