On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is.
I think what he(?) meant was
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:19:27 -0400, S.D.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is.
I think what he(?) meant was something that extracts the navigation
URLs
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:54:09AM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:19:27 -0400, S.D.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:19:27AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
I don't think that's what Pigeon had in
At 14:09 20/09/2004, you wrote:
BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
that's not accurate regarding Flash.
I was under the impression that flash is open source in the same way as
PDF; the format is open, but the big-time applications (FlashMX, Acrobat)
are
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:39:13PM +0100 or thereabouts, Stephen Tait wrote:
At 14:09 20/09/2004, you wrote:
BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
that's not accurate regarding Flash.
I was under the impression that flash is open source in the same way
#secure method=pgp mode=sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S.D.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
that's not accurate regarding Flash.
You're going to have to back that up. Last I checked, Macromedia held
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:54:39PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
#secure method=pgp mode=sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S.D.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
that's not accurate
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:19:27AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
I don't think that's what Pigeon had in
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 09:09:27AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:54:09AM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
That's true -- I wasn't aware of that. However, that doesn't address
the issue that some people don't run Flash for one reason or another.
Most of us have
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:06:06AM +0100 or thereabouts, Pigeon wrote:
[...]
There is another issue that I can see with flash (and please correct
me if I'm not accurate :-) ) which is the monolithic, binary nature of
the files - in fact this leads to two issues:
snip for space
You're quite
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:58:59PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:47:00PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
It would be useful if there was a flash plugin that did nothing but
extract URLs and present them in clickable form, so you could still
navigate web
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:09:29PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:58:59PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
Well, there's a Mozilla extension that does that, anyway.
What's it called? I was googling for such a thing a few days ago
without any luck, and I've looked through the
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is.
I think what he(?) meant was something that extracts the navigation
URLs within a flash animation so that the site is
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
...
I think what he(?) meant was something that extracts the navigation
URLs within a flash animation so that the site is navigable. For
example, many sites have a flash-based homepage with no non-flash
links presented, so if
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 06:43:07PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:09:29PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:58:59PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
Well, there's a Mozilla extension that does that, anyway.
What's it called? I was googling for such a thing a
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:18:01PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
...
I think what he(?)
(yes) :-)
meant was something that extracts the navigation
URLs within a flash animation so that the site is navigable. For
example, many
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:41:32AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
If you are using flash, I must warn
you to only use it to make movies or games, NEVER for
navigation, as it is not a highly accessible
technology. Please, stay away from it for web design.
Well said.
It would be useful if there
Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:41:32AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
If you are using flash, I must warn
you to only use it to make movies or games, NEVER for
navigation, as it is not a highly accessible
technology. Please, stay away from it for web design.
Well said.
It would be useful
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:47:00PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
It would be useful if there was a flash plugin that did nothing but
extract URLs and present them in clickable form, so you could still
navigate web sites that have the above problem but are spared all the
multimedia
Hi all
I was wandering how easy is to develop flash on debian, are there
any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to flash world, and old on
java and c world, but I never had contact with flash beyond .swf
before. Thanks for any advice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Miguel Griffa wrote:
Hi all
I was wandering how easy is to develop flash on debian, are there
any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to flash world, and old on
java and c world, but I never had contact with flash beyond .swf
before. Thanks for any advice
OpenOffice.org (Drawing /
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:09:27 -0500, Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miguel Griffa wrote:
Hi all
I was wandering how easy is to develop flash on debian, are there
any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to flash world, and old on
java and c world, but I never had contact with
--- Andrea Vettorello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:09:27 -0500, Kent West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miguel Griffa wrote:
Hi all
I was wandering how easy is to develop flash
on debian, are there
any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to
flash world, and
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:41:32AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
You could also learn MING. There was also a recent
story about a replacement for MING; check slashdot, I
don't remember exactly, because I didn't pay much
attention to it. If you are using flash, I must warn
you to only use it
Just to back up Zachary's most excellent point on accessibility, here
is my favorite article on how to create accessible flash content:
http://www.webaim.org/techniques/flash/
I think you'll find that Zachary is correct. Flash is for
advertising, kiosk, and limited web use where accessibility
Check this
http://f4l.sourceforge.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo
