Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian releases do not get a version number until they are released.
Huh? Just about any Release file in frozen contains
Version: 2.2
Origin: Debian
Label: Debian
Does that mean that frozen is released?
--
Olaf Meeuwissen Epson Kowa Corpora
Phoenix Amon wrote:
> Hmm. Is that right? The newsletters have been referring to potato as
> "a.k.a. release 2.2" since it's been frozen.
Eh?? I don't remember doing any such thing. I don't have a full DWN archive
here (on a train), but what I do have only refers to "2.2" when talking
about certi
> Phoenix writes:
> > 2.2 is potato...
>
> No. 2.2 will be potato when it is released. 2.2 does not exist yet.
Hmm. Is that right? The newsletters have been referring to potato as "a.k.a.
release 2.2" since it's been frozen. Is it actually 2.2 now, or will it not be
2.2 until it's released? An
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong) wrote:
>> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> potato and woody are just code names. The actual "unstable" is
>> bleeding edge, and frozen is the next release. Currently potato
>> is frozen (a la Debian 2.2) and woody is the new
>> unst
Phoenix writes:
> 2.2 is potato...
No. 2.2 will be potato when it is released. 2.2 does not exist yet.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 07:44:58PM -0500, Marshal Kar-Cheung
> Wong wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused about woody and potato. I though that
>> potato is always the newest, bleeding edge distribution. And
>> that woody is the
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 07:44:58PM -0500, Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about woody and potato. I though that potato is
> always the newest, bleeding edge distribution. And that woody is the
> code-name for the 2.2 release. So why is unstable pointing to woody,
> and frozen
Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused about woody and potato. I though that potato is
> always the newest, bleeding edge distribution. And that woody is the
> code-name for the 2.2 release. So why is unstable pointing to woody,
> and frozen to potato? I found this out when I tr
- Original Message -
From: Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 6:44 PM
Subject: Difference between woody and potato
> I'm a bit confused about woody and potato. I though that potato is
> always the newest, bleeding edge d
> "Phoenix" == Phoenix Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm a bit confused about woody and potato. I though that
>> potato is always the newest, bleeding edge distribution. And
>> that woody is the code-name for the 2.2 release.
> Each version has a code name. The code na
> I'm a bit confused about woody and potato. I though that potato is
> always the newest, bleeding edge distribution. And that woody is the
> code-name for the 2.2 release.
Each version has a code name. The code name doesn't relate to whether the
distribution is in stable or unstable or frozen
I'm a bit confused about woody and potato. I though that potato is
always the newest, bleeding edge distribution. And that woody is the
code-name for the 2.2 release. So why is unstable pointing to woody,
and frozen to potato? I found this out when I tried to get gimp1.1
and found it not there,
12 matches
Mail list logo
