* Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> Fact is though that libc6 has been in Debian stable for over 7
> years, since hamm was releaed mid-1998,
This suggests that we should give it three more years or something
like that.
However, if the packages aren't covered by security support anyway, it
probably doesn'
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:32:41AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:33:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > I already proposed to remove the whole libc5 chaintools and
> > dependencies before woody release. A few users complained because of a
> > few old commerc
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:33:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> I already proposed to remove the whole libc5 chaintools and
> dependencies before woody release. A few users complained because of a
> few old commercial programs (such as wordperfect and so)
> which depends yet on it. I a
Hi all,
Debian unstable & testing still carry around libc5, and some associated
packages like altgcc, libdb1, ld.so and a few others.
Is there nowadays still a use for these packages? Does the amount of
usage warrant the efforts it take to maintain these rather outdated
packages? I get a mixed re
4 matches
Mail list logo
