Re: Documentation and Useability - a proposed solution

2004-01-20 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:48:08PM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote: Pigeon wrote: It's the result of people providing facilities because they want to, and snip I think this may summarize my point(?). For those of you that have expertise with Debian, it must be a no brainier to grab a package

Re: Documentation and Useability - a proposed solution

2004-01-20 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:48:08PM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote: Hopefully I didn't snip too much and get toasted because of it. Hmm... Here is my proposed solution: Only allow completely documented packages in stable. Other packages can go to non-free or Experts Only or some other name

Re: Documentation and Useability

2004-01-19 Thread Pigeon
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 04:01:07PM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote: Pigeon wrote: But why should they be deprived of the opportunity to use it simply because others can't figure out how to? Sure, it's tough on those who can't figure it out, but that's no reason to make life hard for those who can.

Re: Documentation and Useability - a proposed solution

2004-01-19 Thread Mac McCaskie
Pigeon wrote: It's the result of people providing facilities because they want to, and are free to do it in the way that they want to. Most authors/maintainers of free software provide documentation. Some do it better than others. One or two can't be bothered to provide any, and users of their

Re: Documentation and Useability - a proposed solution

2004-01-19 Thread Nano Nano
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:48:08PM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote: Here is my proposed solution: Only allow completely documented packages in stable. Other packages can go to non-free or Experts Only or some other name that will warn the users caution is warrented. This solution WILL NOT

Re: Documentation and Useability - a proposed solution

2004-01-19 Thread Jacob S.
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:48:08 -0600 Mac McCaskie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pigeon wrote: It's the result of people providing facilities because they want to, and are free to do it in the way that they want to. Most authors/maintainers of free software provide documentation. Some do it

Re: Documentation and Useability - a proposed solution

2004-01-19 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Mac McCaskie wrote: My argument is that as a noobie, I have access to packages that are not well documented though the main distribution. STOP ME BEFORE I APT-GET AGAIN -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To

Re: Documentation and Useability

2004-01-18 Thread Mac McCaskie
But why should they be deprived of the opportunity to use it simply because others can't figure out how to? Sure, it's tough on those who can't figure it out, but that's no reason to make life hard for those who can. This agruement contradicts itself. On the one hand it is stated plainly about

Re: Documentation and Useability

2004-01-18 Thread Carl Fink
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 04:01:07PM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote: But why should they be deprived of the opportunity to use it simply because others can't figure out how to? Sure, it's tough on those who can't figure it out, but that's no reason to make life hard for those who can. This