Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-04-17 Thread Daniel Barclay
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 3/22/99 10:21:50 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] labs.com writes: Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man pages for those programs that also have info pages, eh? Don't remove the manpages. And

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-25 Thread Holger Schauer
HM == Hamish Moffatt schrieb am 24 Mar 1999 23:19:54 +0100: HM IMHO, the info browser (in emacs or standalone) adds little HM functionality over a plain HTML document, except that it is much HM less accessible for non-emacs users. I disagree. What if you don't have lynx installed and _need_

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 10:24:29AM +0100, Holger Schauer wrote: MB == Mark Brown schrieb am 23 Mar 1999 03:32:21 +0100: MB everything-HTML conversion seems to be the most likely route MB for those that want a standard interface at present. I am strongly against having a _single_ interface

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-24 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 10:24:29AM +0100, Holger Schauer wrote: IMO man pages serve as a quick thorough overview and should be as compact as possible. Info pages serve IMO a different need: they should provide detailed information, perhaps for some more obscure or advanced features. If _then_

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-23 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Mar 22, 1999 at 11:55:08AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote: Now isn't there a utility that will create 'man' pages out of 'info' ones? If so then at least some current information may be presented in man format for those of us that are more used to the 'older' This would be hard - the

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-23 Thread Holger Schauer
MB == Mark Brown schrieb am 23 Mar 1999 03:32:21 +0100: MB everything-HTML conversion seems to be the most likely route MB for those that want a standard interface at present. I am strongly against having a _single_ interface to documentation. Diversity is a good thing, IMHO, especially in

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-23 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
Olaf Rogalsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This would be wonderful!!! Only one single point from where to search for documentation. If you ever executed a command like find /usr -type f|xargs egrep -li 'proxy|squid' then you know, that a central point for documentation would be a great time

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-22 Thread Olaf Rogalsky
I have to admit, there is a bit of truth to this, alot of people just don't have the time to read 18 different documents in 18 different locations. Man pages, info pages, FAQs, HOWTOs, mini-HOWTOs, READMEs, INSTALL docs, package descriptions... it is a bit daunting. I do feel that

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-22 Thread MallarJ
I also agree with the idea of having a single starting point for documentation. And something I kind of wonder about - why are there always so many documents for a given program? Can't they be combined into one document devided into sections? With info pages, you can get to any specific section

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-22 Thread Dale E. Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man pages for those programs that also have info pages, eh? Don't remove the manpages. And don't start an info vs. man war, either, please! -- +- pgp key available

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-22 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 3/22/99 10:21:50 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] labs.com writes: Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man pages for those programs that also have info pages, eh? Don't remove the manpages. And don't start an info vs. man war,

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-22 Thread Dale E. Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've no intention of starting a flame war - but the fact remains, if the man pages are no longer being supported by developers, there's no sense including them in the man pages package. It just adds to the confusion. Not true. If the manpage says this manpage is

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows

1999-03-22 Thread Timothy Hospedales
Could someone tell me how to read info pages / find out what info pages are available? I know this is probably a dumb question, but I don't seem to have an info topic command - so does info use a different kind of syntax to man or is it a special package or what? Thanks! Tim [EMAIL

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-22 Thread Kenneth Scharf
In a message dated 3/22/99 10:21:50 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] labs.com writes: Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man pages for those programs that also have info pages, eh? Don't remove the manpages. And don't start an info vs. man war,

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows

1999-03-22 Thread Dale E. Martin
Timothy Hospedales [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could someone tell me how to read info pages / find out what info pages are available? I know this is probably a dumb question, but I don't seem to have an info topic command - so does info use a different kind of syntax to man or is it

Re: Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows

1999-03-22 Thread ktb
Timothy Hospedales wrote: Could someone tell me how to read info pages / find out what info pages are available? I know this is probably a dumb question, but I don't seem to have an info topic command - so does info use a different kind of syntax to man or is it a special package

Documentation suggestion (was Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows)

1999-03-17 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
I have to admit, there is a bit of truth to this, alot of people just don't have the time to read 18 different documents in 18 different locations. Man pages, info pages, FAQs, HOWTOs, mini-HOWTOs, READMEs, INSTALL docs, package descriptions... it is a bit daunting. I do feel that anyone