Henrique M Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for Debian, we're in the second test cicle. Maybe if there is a third
cycle for some reason, a kernel update to 2.2.17-pre1 might be considered...
Now it looks likely that we will need a third cycle, because the package
postgresql-6.5.3-22 is
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
Henrique M Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for Debian, we're in the second test cicle. Maybe if there is a third
cycle for some reason, a kernel update to 2.2.17-pre1 might be considered...
Now it looks likely that we will need a third cycle,
Hey,
Didn't 2.2.16 appear to solve some security bugs of 2.2.15? If this is the
case, even if the patches applied to 2.2.15 actually close those security
bugs, wouldn't 2.2.15 give an impression of lack of security?
I can imagine someone who read the security alert (and didn't read carefully
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Paulo J. da Silva e Silva wrote:
Didn't 2.2.16 appear to solve some security bugs of 2.2.15? If this is the
case, even if the patches applied to 2.2.15 actually close those security
bugs, wouldn't 2.2.15 give an impression of lack of security?
The real problem with
Didn't 2.2.16 appear to solve some security bugs of 2.2.15? If this is the
case, even if the patches applied to 2.2.15 actually close those security
bugs, wouldn't 2.2.15 give an impression of lack of security?
This is what I was thinking if/when potato ships with 2.2.15. Potential
new
Or do they intend to ship potato with 2.2.16?
Charles Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Charles Lewis wrote:
Or do they intend to ship potato with 2.2.16?
Potato will probably ship with a patched 2.2.15 (i386 anyways), the
changelog should say if you have the version you want.
later,
Bruce
7 matches
Mail list logo
