On Sunday, 11 June 2017 20:06:48 CEST Brian wrote:
> if you change your sources.list to use a suitable
> one from snapshot.debian.org it will be found.
I didn't know that, thanks!
On Sun 11 Jun 2017 at 11:13:21 +0200, solitone wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 June 2017 10:39:25 CEST Dejan Jocic wrote:
> > In case that you are on stable, perhaps in old stable repository, or its
> > backports, after you add those to sources.list.
>
> No, I'm on stretch, so I'm using the stretch repos
On 11-06-2017 05:06, solitone wrote:
> But where do you find old packages in case you no longer
> have them in /var/cache/apt/archives?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
--
A rolling disk gathers no MOS.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
On Sunday, 11 June 2017 10:39:25 CEST Dejan Jocic wrote:
> In case that you are on stable, perhaps in old stable repository, or its
> backports, after you add those to sources.list.
No, I'm on stretch, so I'm using the stretch repository:
deb http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ stretch main non-free
UTC Time: June 11, 2017 7:39 AM
From: lisi.re...@gmail.com
On Sunday 11 June 2017 08:16:11 Fungi4All wrote:
> Below please find Lisi's answer on whether packages should be reverted or
> not.
!! There is nothing there - not surprising since I have never passed an
opinion on any such thing. Does th
On 11-06-17, solitone wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 June 2017 08:39:25 CEST Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > please, Solitone, let me and the list know what I am supposed to have said.
>
> No Lisi, I don't have more info than the list regarding what you supposedly
> said on this
> topic :-)
>
> In any case, I'
On Sunday, 11 June 2017 08:39:25 CEST Lisi Reisz wrote:
> please, Solitone, let me and the list know what I am supposed to have said.
No Lisi, I don't have more info than the list regarding what you supposedly
said on this
topic :-)
In any case, I've just removed the hold on the 4 chromium pa
On Sunday 11 June 2017 08:16:11 Fungi4All wrote:
> Below please find Lisi's answer on whether packages should be reverted or
> not.
!! There is nothing there - not surprising since I have never passed an
opinion on any such thing. Does the version that went directly to solitone
have a complete
With all the confusion on reply reply-all I has send her/him this
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 10:06 AM
From: fungil...@protonmail.com
To: solitone
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 9:55 AM
From: solit...@mail.com
On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> apt
>
> Hold a package:
> sudo apt-ma
On Saturday 10 June 2017 10:45:22 Fungi4All wrote:
> UTC Time: June 10, 2017 7:42 AM
> From: solit...@mail.com
>
> On Friday, 9 June 2017 23:38:40 CEST Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> > I've never downgrade using apt, but with synaptic it's not too hard,
>
> Hi Jimmy, and thanks for your reply. I'm under Pl
Hi,
I made best progress by using aptitude. However, you have to look at the
dependencies yourself.
How to handle:
- Start aptitude with ncurses gui.
- Mark the required to the former available version.
- Look at the dependencies, you my have to set the dependend libs also to
former versions
On 10-06-17, solitone wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> > apt
> >
> > Hold a package:
> > sudo apt-mark hold
> >
> > Remove the hold:
> > sudo apt-mark unhold
>
> That's ok. I can then:
> $ sudo apt upgrade
> to upgrade that package to the latest available v
--- Begin Message ---
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 9:55 AM
From: solit...@mail.com
On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> apt
>
> Hold a package:
> sudo apt-mark hold
>
> Remove the hold:
> sudo apt-mark unhold
That's ok. I can then:
$ sudo apt upgrade
to upgrade that package to
On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> apt
>
> Hold a package:
> sudo apt-mark hold
>
> Remove the hold:
> sudo apt-mark unhold
That's ok. I can then:
$ sudo apt upgrade
to upgrade that package to the latest available version.
But my question was: once I've upgrated it,
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 7:42 AM
From: solit...@mail.com
On Friday, 9 June 2017 23:38:40 CEST Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> I've never downgrade using apt, but with synaptic it's not too hard,
Hi Jimmy, and thanks for your reply. I'm under Plasma Desktop, so I don't have
synaptic--I use KDE's Discover. A
On Friday, 9 June 2017 23:38:40 CEST Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> I've never downgrade using apt, but with synaptic it's not too hard,
Hi Jimmy, and thanks for your reply. I'm under Plasma Desktop, so I don't have
synaptic--I use KDE's Discover. Although I use it only for automatic updates.
For instal
On 06/09/2017 09:44 PM, solitone wrote:
I am on Debian 9 (scratch), and I have a MacBook Pro 12,1 with retina display.
Few days ago I upgraded Google Chrome from version 58 to 59:
google-chrome-stable:amd64 (58.0.3029.110-1, 59.0.3071.86-1)
This new version no longer supports HiDPI. As a result
I am on Debian 9 (scratch), and I have a MacBook Pro 12,1 with retina display.
Few days ago I upgraded Google Chrome from version 58 to 59:
google-chrome-stable:amd64 (58.0.3029.110-1, 59.0.3071.86-1)
This new version no longer supports HiDPI. As a result everything in Chrome is
so small that I w
18 matches
Mail list logo
