Re: DynIP mail blocking considered harmful (was: Re: My email is rejected by some sites)

2003-12-19 Thread Adam
On Thursday 18 December 2003 21:40, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote: > You share a network neighbourhood with _others_. Your machine start > connections to my machine, and when my machine want's to answer your > machine half an hour later, _your_ machine is gone, or another machine > is answering, or...

Re: DynIP mail blocking considered harmful (was: Re: My email is rejected by some sites)

2003-12-18 Thread Joerg Rossdeutscher
Hi, Am Do, den 18.12.2003 schrieb Karsten M. Self um 03:11: > on Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:37:09PM +0100, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote: > > Am Mi, den 17.12.2003 schrieb Karsten M. Self um 01:21: > > > - There are highly specific filters and methods which can effectively > > > discriminate betwe

Re: DynIP mail blocking considered harmful (was: Re: My email is rejected by some sites)

2003-12-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:37:09PM +0100, Joerg Rossdeutscher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your useful mail. This thread started to fill my killfile... > :-) > > Am Mi, den 17.12.2003 schrieb Karsten M. Self um 01:21: > > - There are highly specific filters and methods which

Re: DynIP mail blocking considered harmful (was: Re: My email is rejected by some sites)

2003-12-17 Thread Joerg Rossdeutscher
Hi, Thanks for your useful mail. This thread started to fill my killfile... :-) Am Mi, den 17.12.2003 schrieb Karsten M. Self um 01:21: > - There are highly specific filters and methods which can effectively > discriminate between spam and non-spam content. Activity-based > lists, Baye

Re: DynIP mail blocking considered harmful (was: Re: My email is rejected by some sites)

2003-12-17 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Magnus von Koeller: Content-Description: signed data > On Wednesday 17 December 2003 01:21, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > This isn't acceptable for general-purpose communications, however. > >  And I'd suggest you look into common carrier laws as well (I'm > > And if you don't like your

Re: DynIP mail blocking considered harmful (was: Re: My email is rejected by some sites)

2003-12-17 Thread Magnus von Koeller
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 01:21, Karsten M. Self wrote: > This isn't acceptable for general-purpose communications, however. >  And I'd suggest you look into common carrier laws as well (I'm > somewhat familiar with US statutes) as to showing preferences by > customer.  I see little distinction

DynIP mail blocking considered harmful (was: Re: My email is rejected by some sites)

2003-12-16 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:09:18PM +, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:34:03PM -0700, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 December 2003 1:08 pm, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote: > > > A mailserver can harm _others_. > > > > I totally agree. Which is why I'm