On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:41, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/01/07 16:18, José Pablo Fernández wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:20, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >> Its been years since I ran ext* but I don't think it can hurt to do
> >> another fsck with the filesystem to
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:18:53PM -0300, Jos? Pablo Fern?ndez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:20, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > Its been years since I ran ext* but I don't think it can hurt to do
> > another fsck with the filesystem totally unmounted. That means that if
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 16:18, José Pablo Fernández wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:20, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>> Its been years since I ran ext* but I don't think it can hurt to do
>> another fsck with the filesystem totally unmounted. T
Hello,
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:20, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Its been years since I ran ext* but I don't think it can hurt to do
> another fsck with the filesystem totally unmounted. That means that if
> this is the / filesystem, you need to use a rescue media not just the
> boot-time
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:25:50PM -0300, Jos? Pablo Fern?ndez wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a server which was turned off (unplugged) without halting and that
> seems to have broken the FS. I managed to fsck it and mount it and now it's
> working, but I've got these errors:
>
> kernel: EXT3-fs erro
Hello,
I have a server which was turned off (unplugged) without halting and that
seems to have broken the FS. I managed to fsck it and mount it and now it's
working, but I've got these errors:
kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md0): ext3_readdir: directory #1141442 contains
a hole at offset 8192
k
6 matches
Mail list logo
