On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:01:00PM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> > Built it last night, the install uses texinfo 4.0b which you can build
> > from the unstable sources, it also depends on dpkg 1.9.17 from unstable
> > which you can just build from the unstable sources again, the install
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable?
> Built it last night, the install uses texinfo 4.0b which you can build
> from the unstable sources, it also depends on dpkg 1.9.17 from unstable
> which you can just build from the unstable sources again, the in
> Built it last night, the install uses texinfo 4.0b which you can build
> from the unstable sources, it also depends on dpkg 1.9.17 from unstable
> which you can just build from the unstable sources again, the install
> for dpkg 1.9.17 will also need debiandoc-sgml (version from stable OK)
> in
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:14:58AM +0100, Glyn Millington wrote:
>
> Before I do the big download. (well, on this modem it's big
> enough).
>
> Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable? I was considering
> building with the source from unstable, but could just as easily get the
>
Before I do the big download. (well, on this modem it's big
enough).
Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable? I was considering
building with the source from unstable, but could just as easily get the
raw source and do the job in /usr/local. Any reason why either of these
should
5 matches
Mail list logo