Hello Steef and *,
Am 2006-12-06 20:03:12, schrieb steef:
> thanks michelle. your answer makes things much clearer. i understand
> your remarks better now.
The problem is:
HOW can I install Debian ON SUCH MACHINES in the future?
The machines are 333 to 450 MHz and I can not say, they a
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-11-26 11:45:02, schrieb steef:
i do not understand. what is the problem??
quote:
*SMP images merged with non-SMP*. After the release of
linux-image-2.6.17-2 the SMP and non-smp images where integrated into
^^^
Douglas Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:50:58AM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
Sounds like I'll have to start over and stick to one or the other.
No, just start using aptitude, stop using apt-get, and go manually
through the list of packages from within aptitude, determine if they'
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:50:58AM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > > > Sounds like I'll have to start over and stick to one or the other.
> > >
> > > No, just start using aptitude, stop using apt-get, and go manually
> > > through the list of packages from within aptitude, determine if they're
> > > one
Am 2006-11-26 11:45:02, schrieb steef:
> i do not understand. what is the problem??
>
> quote:
> >*SMP images merged with non-SMP*. After the release of
> >linux-image-2.6.17-2 the SMP and non-smp images where integrated into
^^^ ^^
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:37:34PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:21:25PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:50:24PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:13:56P
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:21:25PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:50:24PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:13:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:36:39PM EST, D
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:21:25PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:50:24PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:13:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:36:39PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> I did the etch upgrade following t
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:50:24PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:13:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:36:39PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
[..]
> > I normally use apt-get or command-line aptitude.
>
> Part of your difficulty could be using two differ
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:13:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:36:39PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > > Everything went well until I tried to boot the 2.6.17 kernel.
> >
> > Do I read this right?: You're OK running Etch with kernel 2.6.8 and the
> > problem is booting to 2.6
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:36:39PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> Hi Cga,
>
> I've put my comments inline to make things clearer (I hope).
>
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 02:39:38PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
[..]
> > Everything went well until I tried to boot the 2.6.17 kernel.
>
> Do I read this right?:
As you implied I took it one step at a time, making sure I still had
connectivity after each one of them:
1. Did a minimal Sarge install
2. Installed the 2.6.8 kernel alongside the "native" 2.4.27
3. Upgraded to testing/etch via a dist-upgrade
4. Installed the etch 2.6.17 kernel alongside his tw
Hi Cga,
I've put my comments inline to make things clearer (I hope).
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 02:39:38PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:10:25AM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:15:01PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > > So it looks like I'm stuck with a 2.4 ker
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:10:25AM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:15:01PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
[..]
> > So it looks like I'm stuck with a 2.4 kernel for the lifetime of this
> > laptop.
> >
>
> What card is not recognized? I would suggest tackling that as a
> specific
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-11-23 22:15:01, schrieb cga2000:
I installed the latest 2.6.18.3 alongside the 2.4.27 that initially
came with the sarge netinst and sure enough my PC card is no longer
recognized.
So it looks like I'm stuck with a 2.4 kernel for the lifetime of this
laptop.
Am 2006-11-23 22:15:01, schrieb cga2000:
> I installed the latest 2.6.18.3 alongside the 2.4.27 that initially
> came with the sarge netinst and sure enough my PC card is no longer
> recognized.
>
> So it looks like I'm stuck with a 2.4 kernel for the lifetime of this
> laptop.
You can install o
On Thu, 2006-23-11 at 22:15 -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:56:50PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > > > It's upto you if you want a 2.6 or 2.4 kernel.. :)
>
> Well not really...
>
> :-(
>
> I installed the latest 2.6.18.3 alongside the 2.4.27 that initially
> came w
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:15:01PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:56:50PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > > > It's upto you if you want a 2.6 or 2.4 kernel.. :)
>
> Well not really...
>
> :-(
>
> I installed the latest 2.6.18.3 alongside the 2.4.27 that initially
>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:56:50PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
[..]
> > > It's upto you if you want a 2.6 or 2.4 kernel.. :)
Well not really...
:-(
I installed the latest 2.6.18.3 alongside the 2.4.27 that initially
came with the sarge netinst and sure enough my PC card is no longer
recognized.
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:07:58 -0500
cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:30:00PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > On Tue November 21 2006 13:47, cga2000 wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > > I did notice that I'm still running the sarge 2.4.27 kernel
> > > instead of the 2.6.17 that's in
On Tue November 21 2006 19:07, cga2000 wrote:
> > > I did notice that I'm still running the sarge 2.4.27 kernel instead of
> > > the 2.6.17 that's in the etch repository..
> > >
> > > Is this "normal" .. or did my dist-upgrade run into a problem and
> > > decide not to upgrade to a more recent ker
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:07:58PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:30:00PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > On Tue November 21 2006 13:47, cga2000 wrote:
> So you are telling me that "apt-get/aptitude dist-upgrade" do not
> upgrade the kernel .. IOW that what I have experienced is "
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:30:00PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Tue November 21 2006 13:47, cga2000 wrote:
[..]
> > I did notice that I'm still running the sarge 2.4.27 kernel instead of
> > the 2.6.17 that's in the etch repository..
> >
> > Is this "normal" .. or did my dist-upgrade run into a p
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:03:40PM EST, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:38:09PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:27:23PM EST, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>
> > Good point. Last time I tried was 8 months ago and I would rather do
> > an etch install than a sar
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:38:09PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:27:23PM EST, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Good point. Last time I tried was 8 months ago and I would rather do
> an etch install than a sarge+upgrade. So I'll give it another shot.
>
> > I guess you have a fa
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:27:23PM EST, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[..]
>
> How do you come to the conclusion that the stable etch installer
> wouldn't work better with that laptop?
bug #352758 is still marked as "outstanding" ..
> If any linux works with your nic, so should debian etch and i
cga2000 wrote:
> I have heard rumors that etch will soon become stable.
>
> Would any one know when this is likely to happen?
Current schedule is end of this year. [1]
> Or is it already "frozen" and I could start my reinstall this coming
> week-end without having to do it all over again when i
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:01:35AM EST, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:22:47PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
[..]
> > I have heard rumors that etch will soon become stable.
> >
> > Would any one know when this is likely to happen?
> >
> > Or is it already "frozen" and I could start my
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:22:47PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> I need to upgrade my current sarge to something more current.
>
> Is this the recommended procedure -- the one less likely to provide
> major headaches:
>
> 1. Install sarge on a new partition
> 2. Wait till etch become stable.
> 3. Do a
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:25:14PM EST, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:22:47PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > I need to upgrade my current sarge to something more current.
> >
> > Is this the recommended procedure -- the one less likely to provide
> > major headaches:
> >
> > 1.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:51:44PM EST, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:22:47 -0500
> cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I need to upgrade my current sarge to something more current.
> >
> > Is this the recommended procedure -- the one less likely to provide
> > major headaches:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:22:47 -0500
cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to upgrade my current sarge to something more current.
>
> Is this the recommended procedure -- the one less likely to provide
> major headaches:
>
> 1. Install sarge on a new partition
> 2. Wait till etch become stab
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:22:47PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> I need to upgrade my current sarge to something more current.
>
> Is this the recommended procedure -- the one less likely to provide
> major headaches:
>
> 1. Install sarge on a new partition
> 2. Wait till etch become stable.
> 3. Do a
I need to upgrade my current sarge to something more current.
Is this the recommended procedure -- the one less likely to provide
major headaches:
1. Install sarge on a new partition
2. Wait till etch become stable.
3. Do a blind upgrade.
4. Customize.
I need to re-install sarge because I have
34 matches
Mail list logo
