Re: Etch w/o icedove (OOPS!)

2006-12-14 Thread Marc Shapiro
Alexander Sack wrote: On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:32:06PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote: My mistake. I was confusing icedove with iceweasel (which does not seem to be ready for Etch, yet). When I did 'aptitude hold thunderbird' before the dist-upgrade then it did not try to install icedove.

Re: Etch w/o icedove (OOPS!)

2006-12-14 Thread Alexander Sack
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:32:06PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote: > My mistake. I was confusing icedove with iceweasel (which does not seem > to be ready for Etch, yet). When I did 'aptitude hold thunderbird' > before the dist-upgrade then it did not try to install icedove. > Just remember that n

Re: Etch w/o icedove (OOPS!)

2006-11-25 Thread Marc Shapiro
Marc Shapiro wrote: I have Etch installed and have been keeping it up to date with occaisional updates using aptitude. I decided to see what it would want to do if I asked for a dist-upgrade. The answere -- it wants to install icedove. I do not need icedove. I have the upstream firefox 2.