Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:33:28AM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by which certain messages are received by procmail, and a
copy of some is forwarded to another
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:33:28AM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by which certain messages are received by procmail, and a
copy of some is forwarded to another
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Roel Schroeven wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:33:28AM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by which certain messages
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:54:38PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Meaning that this command does not produce a response?
telnet smarthost 25
Exactly.
So what happens if you run exim on another port, and then do your port
forwarding on that very same computer?
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Roel Schroeven wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:33:28AM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by which certain messages are received by procmail, and a
copy of some is forwarded to another address automatically.
Now, recently, due to excessive spread of viruses on the network due
to a popular but
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by which certain messages are received by procmail, and a
copy of some is forwarded to another address automatically.
Now, recently, due to excessive spread of viruses on the
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:33:28AM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by which certain messages are received by procmail, and a
copy of some is forwarded to another address
Kumar Appaiah a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:33:28AM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear list,
I have been using fetchmail + procmail + exim4 to handle my mail. I
have a setup by which certain messages are received by procmail, and a
copy of some is forwarded to
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:28:49PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
Kumar Appaiah a écrit :
The problem is that all my requests to the smarthost's port 25 are
blocked. So, I try to ssh to another computer, forward the port 25 of
that SMTP server to port 10025 on my computer, and tell exim to use
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Because there is no SMTP server running there! The server runs SMTP on
port 25, which is blocked, and I have a connection to that port 25
through my machine's 10025 port.
Do you control that other machine? What is preventing you from opening up
another port for Exim
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
The problem is that all my requests to the smarthost's port 25 are
blocked.
Meaning that this command does not produce a response?
telnet smarthost 25
smarthost being something like mail.isp.com or (better) their IP
address. Will they give you an MX address?
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 07:08:01PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Because there is no SMTP server running there! The server runs SMTP on
port 25, which is blocked, and I have a connection to that port 25
through my machine's 10025 port.
Do you control that other
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:54:38PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
The problem is that all my requests to the smarthost's port 25 are
blocked.
Meaning that this command does not produce a response?
telnet smarthost 25
Exactly. But I have ssh access to another
James Vahn wrote:
Meaning that this command does not produce a response?
James, you're way off base. Look, his ISP has blocked him from outbound
port 25 connections. He did not every connect to his ISP's SMTP server. He
does not want to connect to his ISP's SMTP server. He wants to
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 07:08:01PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Do you control that other machine? What is preventing you from opening up
another port for Exim (presuming it is running Exim) to listen to?
1.I do not control the other machine.
2.How would making exim4 on
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Thanks for patiently anwering my query, hope it's clear now. Now, can
you think of a solution?
How attached are you to Exim? Personally when it comes to smarthost
relaying I found nullmailer to be a much better alternative. Smaller,
specially designed to forward to a
17 matches
Mail list logo
