Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-17 Thread Emanoil Kotsev
Stefan Monnier wrote: >> does it apply on CF cards? The name says flash, so I would assume yes? >> But still, I think it really reasonable to consider the life of the >> media. > > Yes, same thing. BTW, regarding the life of the media: let's say the > internal maximum write speed is 50MB/s, an e

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-17 Thread Johan Kullstam
"Masatran / Deepak, R." writes: > Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and > one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my laptop > to my work computer, the UIDs on the Ext3 partition are used for the > permissions, so I am not able to acc

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-16 Thread Stefan Monnier
> does it apply on CF cards? The name says flash, so I would assume yes? But > still, I think it really reasonable to consider the life of the media. Yes, same thing. BTW, regarding the life of the media: let's say the internal maximum write speed is 50MB/s, an expected lifetime of 10-writes,

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-16 Thread Emanoil Kotsev
Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Why ext2 rather than ext3? >> I think you trimmed that line a bit prematurely in that it went on to >> say "flash drive". ext2 is arguably better than ext3 for flash drives >> because of the reduced number of writes to disk. > > The extra writes of ext3 have 2 consequen

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-13 Thread Mike McClain
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:15:33AM +, Bob Cox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 22:14:59 -0700, Mike McClain (mike.j...@nethere.com) > wrote: > > Which versions of Windows can read ext2? > > Windows 95/98/2000/XP/NT definitely. Not sure about Vista. > > Google for explore2fs. > Found it,

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-12 Thread Adrian Levi
2009/3/12 Bob Cox : > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 22:14:59 -0700, Mike McClain (mike.j...@nethere.com) > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote: >> > Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote: >> > >Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> Why ext2 rather than ext3? > I think you trimmed that line a bit prematurely in that it went on to > say "flash drive". ext2 is arguably better than ext3 for flash drives > because of the reduced number of writes to disk. The extra writes of ext3 have 2 consequences: 1 - slow things down 2 - w

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-12 Thread Bob Cox
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:04:27 -0400, Stefan Monnier (monn...@iro.umontreal.ca) wrote: > >> > Why so many difficult answers? > >> > If you normally use ext3, use ext2(ext3 without journalizing) on your > > Why ext2 rather than ext3? I think you trimmed that line a bit prematurely in that it

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> > Why so many difficult answers? >> > If you normally use ext3, use ext2(ext3 without journalizing) on your Why ext2 rather than ext3? > Google for explore2fs. It claims to support both ext2 and ext3. Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Allums
Mike McClain wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote: Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote: Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my Why so many difficult answe

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-12 Thread Bob Cox
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 22:14:59 -0700, Mike McClain (mike.j...@nethere.com) wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote: > > Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote: > > >Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and > > >one Ext3 partition. Th

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-11 Thread Mike McClain
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote: > Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote: > >Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and > >one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my > Why so many difficult answers? > If you nor

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-11 Thread Mark Allums
Sam Leon wrote: Mark Allums wrote: Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote: Masatran / Deepak, R.: Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and one Ext3 partition. Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At l

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:19:09AM -0500, Mark Allums wrote: > Let's us all start a movement, an exFat on Linux movement. exFAT is written by a known patent troll who is already suing a Linux company for a patent that may or may not be valid. I'd stay away from exFAT. http://lwn.net/Articles

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-11 Thread Jens Van Broeckhoven
Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote: Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my laptop to my work computer, the UIDs on the Ext3 partition are used for the permissions, so I am not able to access the dat

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-11 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and >> one Ext3 partition. > Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash > drives probably don't have smart wear levelling. ext3 is not significantly different in this respect from most other FSes (inc

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-11 Thread Mark Allums
Sam Leon wrote: Mark Allums wrote: Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote: Masatran / Deepak, R.: Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and one Ext3 partition. Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At l

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-11 Thread Sam Leon
Mark Allums wrote: Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote: Masatran / Deepak, R.: Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and one Ext3 partition. Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-10 Thread Mark Allums
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote: Masatran / Deepak, R.: Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and one Ext3 partition. Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash drives probably don't

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-10 Thread Benjamin M. A'Lee
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote: > Masatran / Deepak, R.: > > > > Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and > > one Ext3 partition. > > Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash > drives probably don't have sma

Re: Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-10 Thread Jochen Schulz
Masatran / Deepak, R.: > > Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and > one Ext3 partition. Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash drives probably don't have smart wear levelling. > The problem is that when I transfer files from my lapto

Ext3 for flash drive

2009-03-10 Thread Masatran / Deepak, R.
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my laptop to my work computer, the UIDs on the Ext3 partition are used for the permissions, so I am not able to access the data. How can I fix this? Both co