Re: FAST ACM! But "broken" timer? Gurus needed. Was: ACM 4.7-3 with Debian Linux 1.2.4

1997-05-03 Thread Nicola Bernardelli
> END of _monologue_ about ACM 4.7 :-) VERY last, I forgot: in order to make it easy to read with Ghostview, I also prepared (quite a lot of time ago) a version of acmdoc.ps with page order reversed than in the original (that is lower to higher, but yet no page numbers, I mean nothing else ha

Re: FAST ACM! But "broken" timer? Gurus needed. Was: ACM 4.7-3 with Debian Linux 1.2.4

1997-05-03 Thread Nicola Bernardelli
> There is a chance that THE ACM DEBIAN PACKAGE IS WORTH BEING > RE-PREAPARED INCLUDING BINARIES BUILT WITH THE REAL_DELTA_T=no SETTING, > that is the binaries given by the self-applying workaround I posted > yesterday under the same subject (besides, they are compiled with more > optimization

Re: FAST ACM! But "broken" timer? Gurus needed. Was: ACM 4.7-3 with Debian Linux 1.2.4

1997-05-02 Thread Nicola Bernardelli
SUMMARY: - I dare advance the proposal to slightly change the Debian acm-4.7 package (but Ian Murdock is not the maintainer of the package any more, so who should I say?). - I wonder (though I suppose not) whether gettimeofday() gives different values than in Linux in some non-Linux Un

FAST ACM! But "broken" timer? Gurus needed. Was: ACM 4.7-3 with Debian Linux 1.2.4

1997-05-01 Thread Nicola Bernardelli
On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Nicola Bernardelli wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Nicola Bernardelli wrote: > > > On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Nicola Bernardelli wrote: > > > > > Sad to say, I'm not replying to my own question about Air Combat > > > Maneuvers under Debian 1.2.4... > > > > Not yet... > >