Just wanted to say thanks for the replies!
Considering these replies, I think I will just make a seperate ext3
for home, and manually save a second copy of a document if I want.
Thanks again!
---
Scotty Fitzgerald
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 17:40:06 +0200, David P James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On F
Olav wrote:
Why not like this:
- mount your Windows partition to some mount point like /mnt/windows
- create a symlink named "My Documents" in your home to point to the
folder with the same name on the Windows partition
It keeps the dot file clutter away from Windows, it wouldn't know what
to do w
On Fri 8 October 2004 07:22, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:
> Can that FAT32 structure handle all of /homes files?
If you do this, make sure you don't try to use maildir format mail
folders in your /home partition - this is particularly the case if you
use KMail which now defaults to maildir in ~/Mail
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 01:59:20PM +0200, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 11:22:13 GMT, Scotty Fitzgerald
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I got an official "woody" set and am now setting it up, and am
> > wondering if this "bright" idea of mine is actually advisab
On Friday 08 October 2004 03:22 am, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:
> Hello,
> I got an official "woody" set and am now setting it up, and am
> wondering if this "bright" idea of mine is actually advisable.
> I thought that if I mounted a seperate and small partition as
> the /home directory, as well as
Olle wrote:
> BTW, I don't really see how backing up the home directory would be
> enough, at least for me. I tend to make lots of changes system wide so
> that I get the same settings for root as my ordinary user account, and
> half the time it is just easier to make the changes in the existing
>
On Friday 08 October 2004 13.22, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:
> I thought that if I mounted a seperate and small partition as
> the /home directory, as well as using the same partition for storing
> documents and user files from my Windows 2000 Pro (the other side of
> my dual boot system,) that I co
Op vr 08-10-2004, om 13:59 schreef Andrea Vettorello:
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 11:22:13 GMT, Scotty Fitzgerald
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I got an official "woody" set and am now setting it up, and am
> > wondering if this "bright" idea of mine is actually advisable.
> >
Op vr 08-10-2004, om 13:22 schreef Scotty Fitzgerald:
> Hello,
> I got an official "woody" set and am now setting it up, and am
> wondering if this "bright" idea of mine is actually advisable.
> I thought that if I mounted a seperate and small partition as
> the /home directory, as wel
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:59:20 +0200, Andrea Vettorello
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC FAT32 lacks user/group and the default attributes (rwx, correct
> me if i'm wrong), so IMHO not a good idea to use for home...
>
> You should find some windos programs to read (only?) ext2 partitions
> (never us
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 11:22:13 GMT, Scotty Fitzgerald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I got an official "woody" set and am now setting it up, and am
> wondering if this "bright" idea of mine is actually advisable.
> I thought that if I mounted a seperate and small partition as
>
Hello,
I got an official "woody" set and am now setting it up, and am
wondering if this "bright" idea of mine is actually advisable.
I thought that if I mounted a seperate and small partition as
the /home directory, as well as using the same partition for storing
documents and user
12 matches
Mail list logo