Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hey, I do not know who invented L and R. That is really problem in
> modern world. They sound same to me :) Problem is that English is a
> lingua-franca of computer world and I do not speak/spell well.
> ("frustrated")
Your english is excellent, I've seen far funnier mistake
Hi Simon from UK,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 03:07:05AM +0100, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > To avoid this kind of flustration, dselect is better tool. With that we
> > can see and confirm package names. This is true for kernel-image since
> > it evolve really fast with strange co
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> To avoid this kind of flustration, dselect is better tool. With that we
> can see and confirm package names. This is true for kernel-image since
> it evolve really fast with strange combination of name mutation.
>
> Just my thought. (I like apt-get though)
flustration ? I'v
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:11:11PM -0700, curtis wrote:
> Let's go back to my original problem.
I see question was answered. Good. :)
To avoid this kind of flustration, dselect is better tool. With that we
can see and confirm package names. This is true for kernel-image since
it evolve really
curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apt-get install kernel-imgage-
> In this case, when I type apt-get install kernal-image-2.4.17-386 (the
> kernel version on my other computers), I get the following message:
>Package kernel-image-2.4.17-386 has no available version, but exists
>in the
It seems that it must have been removed from the archive between your
installs. 2.4.17 does not exist on the archives now, only
2.4.17-b42.4. I may be wrong but it seems to me it hasn't been there
for several weeks. I would suggest installing 2.4.18.
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 19:11, curtis wrote:
>
Let's go back to my original problem.
Here's my letter:
I upgraded the kernels on all of computers per instructions, which
are provided at the end of the message.
This worked on all but one computer.
I assumed that that computer was upgraded to 2.4, but I discovered
recently that
Hi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:11:50PM -0500, dman wrote:
> Will anyone help curtis? I don't know about the 'bf' kernels.
bf = boot floppy
Special kernel flavor compiled for the initial system installation.
It should be quite useful but may not have all the bells and whistle.
Just install norma
Will anyone help curtis? I don't know about the 'bf' kernels.
-D
- Forwarded message from curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
| From: curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Kernel identification
| Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:41:50 -070
9 matches
Mail list logo
