: failed to load regulatory.db
The second is that large file transfers on the LAN are almost
unbelievably slow, requiring (for instance) more than three
hours to copy a 5 gigabyte file from one system to another. Such
operations required only a few minutes before the upgrade of 03/28.
I found some
Am 17.01.2018 um 23:22 schrieb Michael Stone:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:55:21PM +0100, Michael wrote:
When I copy the same file 3 times onto the same share I get an
average of
108 MB/s with SMB/CIFS
84 MB/s with NFS (async,no_subtree_check)
What's the server? Also try grep MOUNTPOINT /proc/
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:55:21PM +0100, Michael wrote:
When I copy the same file 3 times onto the same share I get an average of
108 MB/s with SMB/CIFS
84 MB/s with NFS (async,no_subtree_check)
What's the server? Also try
grep MOUNTPOINT /proc/mounts
(where MOUNTPOINT is /whatever your NFS
Am 17.01.2018 um 16:37 schrieb Dan Ritter:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Michael wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I have recently installed Debian Stretch 9.3 on a new PC and I'd
just like
>> to provide some NFS shares for other Linux machines in the LAN
(1GBit). With
>> small files eve
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have recently installed Debian Stretch 9.3 on a new PC and I'd just like
> to provide some NFS shares for other Linux machines in the LAN (1GBit). With
> small files everything works fine, but if I try to copy, e.g., a 7G
Hello guys,
I have recently installed Debian Stretch 9.3 on a new PC and I'd just
like to provide some NFS shares for other Linux machines in the LAN
(1GBit). With small files everything works fine, but if I try to copy,
e.g., a 7GB file with rsync it starts with a high transmission rate
abov
> paired my desktop computer and my tablet but file transfers failed. The
> tablet said the failure was because the computer does not use obexftp so
> I installed obexftp and obexfs. hciconfig found the bluetooth device to
> be hci0 so I entered the command
Hi.
Packages you'
paired my desktop computer and my tablet but file transfers failed. The
tablet said the failure was because the computer does not use obexftp so
I installed obexftp and obexfs. hciconfig found the bluetooth device to
be hci0 so I entered the command
obexfs -b hci0
This was accepted but did
Hi every one.
Lately after a fresh install of Debian Ecth I'm having this most
annoying problem, the transfer of files using nautilus takes two time as
much than it did before, but only when copying from an external medium
to my hard drive or copying from one folder to another in my hard drive
if i
Hi every one.
Lately after a fresh install of Debian Ecth I'm having this most
annoying problem, the transfer of files using nautilus takes two time as
much time than it did before, if i transfer files using rsync the
problem doesn't show so, i think its got to be something to do with
nautilus.
Did
Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest that you look into making a ethernet-serial connector. I
> won't swear that this can be done...but I would expect that you can find
> the pin-outs for a standard 10bT connection and match them to the
> pin-outs for the DB9 connector and make a cross
frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assumming you can get some sort of ethernet connection, install
apache/some
> web server on the computers you want files off. This how I transfered
files
> off my brother's winblose box, just needed him to enable tcp/ip, and
install
> the windows apache off a comp
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:02:07PM -0500, Seneca
Cunningha([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote:
>
> > Before anyone tells me to convert the Windows computer, I am not
> > allowed to change _anything_ about that computer.
>
> Define "change".
>
> If you want to set yourself up so t
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 22:21:15 -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
>I wish that the solution were so simple as this..
>
>Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, $0.00 solutions below:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:02:07PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
>>> I am looking for a fast and reliable
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> If this goes on much longer, after exams I'll attempt to fix my possible
> answer to this problem that partially works in some DOS environments with a
> serial cable. All I need to do is get the files to transfer properly.
> Curre
Please post message by respecting THREADING uning good MUA, please :)
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:21:15PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> I wish that the solution were so simple as this..
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:02:07PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> >> I am looking for a fast and relia
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:43:40PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> See above WRT borrowing hardware. Depending on your location, you may
> be able to "buy" a solution and take it back to the store for a return.
> Or at least an exchange. Check policies first. Your credit card may
> offer you som
on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:02:07PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I am looking for a fast and reliable method for transferring files between
> systems.
> In response to the listed options, I have no access to a CD burner, I
> have no working Ethernet cards, and currently it
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the Windows box have a modem? Does your Debian laptop have one?
> I've done modem-to-modem file transfers before. Okay, this was so
> long ago they were both running MS DOS 3.3, but it should still work.
>
> Can you *borrow*
n any way,
> shape, or form (although I was sorely tempted when Windows zapped its own
> ability to startup).
Does the Windows box have a modem? Does your Debian laptop have one?
I've done modem-to-modem file transfers before. Okay, this was so
long ago they were both running MS DOS 3.3,
Hardware and budgetary issues add difficulty to finding a fast and reliable
method for transferring files between systems...
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:21:15PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > The amusing part about getting an ethernet card i
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:21:15PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
[snip]
> The amusing part about getting an ethernet card is that I have 2 that are
> physically compatible with my Debian computer, but both of them are broken.
[another]
> Any more ideas for two awkward computers in an awkward
I wish that the solution were so simple as this..
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, $0.00 solutions below:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:02:07PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
>> I am looking for a fast and reliable method for transferring files
between
>> systems.
> ...
>> In respons
Hi, $0.00 solutions below:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:02:07PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> I am looking for a fast and reliable method for transferring files between
> systems.
...
> In response to the listed options, I have no access to a CD burner, I have
> no working Ethernet cards, and cu
I am looking for a fast and reliable method for transferring files between
systems.
David Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seneca Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SC> and other such difficulties, could it just be a few bad transfers
> SC> by floppy, as large packages (>1.4M) have to b
ftp is probably a good choice.
Samba works too, but I have been told, and have found that it's
relatively inefficient--lower throughput that ftp.
In scripts running from NT 4 or 5 I've noticed that MS shares tend to
drop after a period of inactivity. While this is fine, they don't get
reconnecte
Additionally you could use smbclient. This allows batch transfers as well and
you
wouldn't have to run an FTP server on the target machine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hiya
>
> what would be the best way to routinely (ie. daily) transfer 500MB worth of
> image files from a linux system to a Windo
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 03:52:00PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> what would be the best way to routinely (ie. daily) transfer 500MB worth of
> image files from a linux system to a Windows 2000 or NT?
This reminds me of an old joke:
Customer: "What's the fastest way to move 500 megabyt
> "kmself" == kmself writes:
kmself> FTP is an old reliable.
Just make sure you transfer files in "binary" mode, and not "ascii" ;-).
(unless, of course, they really are ascii).
kmself> ...but FTP should fit the bill. What other alternatives
kmself> were you considering/are av
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 03:52:00PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hiya
>
> what would be the best way to routinely (ie. daily) transfer 500MB worth of
> image files from a linux system to a Windows 2000 or NT?
>
> would ftp be the best choice or is it prone to bad behaviour if
> unsupervised?
Hiya
what would be the best way to routinely (ie. daily) transfer 500MB worth of
image files from a linux system to a Windows 2000 or NT?
would ftp be the best choice or is it prone to bad behaviour if
unsupervised?
Zane
> Are there any known concerns with the PIII chip and Linux?
> Thanks
Thanks to everyone for the responses. A new kernel (2.2.9) has done the
trick, as far as the networking issues go.
Anyone know if a kernel version can have any sort of effect on
applications running on a machine? O
300 with dual PIII 500's,
> has had a severe problem with large file transfers over ftp. (We
> have a large number of large files that are moved to all new machines
> - proprietary applications, several databases and files. Because of
> the nature of these files, they nee
On 06-Jul-99 Jef Elliott wrote:
>
> Just joined the list - looks to be a good resource. Hope
> someone can offer some insight or advice.
>
>
> Are there any known concerns with the PIII chip and Linux?
>
>
Nope, other than it runs really fast (-:
> We run Debian on
, and others run 2.1. However,
all run the 2.0.36 kernel.
One of these servers, a PowerEdge 6300 with dual PIII 500's,
has had a severe problem with large file transfers over ftp. (We
have a large number of large files that are moved to all new machines
- proprietary applica
35 matches
Mail list logo
