Hey Andrei:
Thanks for getting back.
Q. Did the network setup step during the installation work?
A. Good question. I was so concerned with disk management, I did not notice. I
am looking at starting from scratch. I now have some experience and good
recommendations. The physical connection is
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Lisi wrote:
[...]
> If you use CDs you may have to keep
> changing the CD. The full set is now something like 11 is it not?
>
I have yet to need anything other than CD 1 or DVD 1 for installing. So
nothing gained there from a netinstall.
Mark
On Friday 02 July 2010 21:47:13 Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
> > Thanks Guys:
> >
> > Looks like a serious operator malfunction on my part. My first time
> > with an internet install. In the past, I had a CD with the whole
> > distribution on it.
>
> This is
On Friday 02 July 2010 20:38:52 Keith Mitchell wrote:
> Firefox and Thunderbird do have
> copyrighted stuff, however, Iceweasel did not have a Windows
> installation, otherwise I would be using it on Windows.
Firefox and Iceweasel are the same thing, so there is a version for Windows.
The copyr
On Friday 02 July 2010 19:23:50 Joe wrote:
> In those days I was using fixed addresses on my couple of network
> machines, and so was not running dhcp on the sarge machine. Apparently,
> if during the installation, a dhcp server was not found, and you hadn't
> picked the expert install, you didn't
On 02/07/10 21:47, Mark wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Keith Mitchell mailto:kpmitch...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks Guys:
Looks like a serious operator malfunction on my part. My first time
with an internet install. In the past, I had a CD with the whole
distribution on i
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
> Thanks Guys:
>
> Looks like a serious operator malfunction on my part. My first time
> with an internet install. In the past, I had a CD with the whole
> distribution on it.
>
This is something I haven't been able to wrap my head around yet
On 07/02/2010 02:38 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
Thanks Guys:
Looks like a serious operator malfunction on my part. My first time
with an internet install. In the past, I had a CD with the whole
distribution on it.
First, Sorry. I did not wish to infer that Debian itself is
brain-dead. I meant the
Thanks Guys:
Looks like a serious operator malfunction on my part. My first time
with an internet install. In the past, I had a CD with the whole
distribution on it.
First, Sorry. I did not wish to infer that Debian itself is
brain-dead. I meant the minimal installation that I myself created
with
> On Vi, 02 iul 10, 00:49:53, Keith Mitchell wrote:
>> I decided to build a Linux box instead of emulating Linux using
>> VM-Ware under Windows. I heard Debian was the way to go. I have
>> created Red-Hat and Ubuntu Linux boxes in the past with no problems.
Who did you hear this from? Irrelevant,
On 02/07/10 14:03, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 02/07/10 08:46, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[Please reply to debian-user only. If you are not subscribed please ask
for CCs]
(full quote for context)
On Vi, 02 iul 10, 00:49:53, Keith Mitchell wrote:
I decided to build a Linux box instead of emulating Linu
On 02/07/10 08:46, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[Please reply to debian-user only. If you are not subscribed please ask
for CCs]
(full quote for context)
On Vi, 02 iul 10, 00:49:53, Keith Mitchell wrote:
I decided to build a Linux box instead of emulating Linux using
VM-Ware under Windows. I heard De
[Please reply to debian-user only. If you are not subscribed please ask
for CCs]
(full quote for context)
On Vi, 02 iul 10, 00:49:53, Keith Mitchell wrote:
> I decided to build a Linux box instead of emulating Linux using
> VM-Ware under Windows. I heard Debian was the way to go. I have
> create
13 matches
Mail list logo
