Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-27 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2010-03-27 21:47, R. Clayton wrote: So, I don't know exactly *how* you'd format a device as "fat32". I used "mkfs.vfat -F 32 /dev/sda1" Ah. I just do mkfs.vfat. According to "man mkfs.vfat": -F FAT-size Specifies the type of file allocation tables

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-27 Thread R. Clayton
So, I don't know exactly *how* you'd format a device as "fat32". I used "mkfs.vfat -F 32 /dev/sda1" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4sx9n7o@

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-27 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2010-03-27 14:02, Kelly Clowers wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 00:15, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-03-26 21:03, R. Clayton wrote: Thanks for your replies to my message. Putting a fat32 fs on the thumb drive did the trick; the block size is 4k, matching what's on the hard drive file systems.

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-27 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 00:15, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2010-03-26 21:03, R. Clayton wrote: >> >> Thanks for your replies to my message.  Putting a fat32 fs on the thumb >> drive >> did the trick; the block size is 4k, matching what's on the hard drive >> file >> systems. >> > > fat32 is still not

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-27 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2010-03-26 21:03, R. Clayton wrote: Thanks for your replies to my message. Putting a fat32 fs on the thumb drive did the trick; the block size is 4k, matching what's on the hard drive file systems. fat32 is still not recommended. Use vfat. -- "History does not long entrust the care of fr

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-26 Thread R. Clayton
Thanks for your replies to my message. Putting a fat32 fs on the thumb drive did the trick; the block size is 4k, matching what's on the hard drive file systems. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-26 Thread Bob McGowan
Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2010-03-24 12:07, Bob McGowan wrote: > [snip] >> >> And, I used VFAT for the filesystem type: > > That's the key difference, since vfat "is" fat32. > Ah, yes. Too long since I've dealt much with FAT of any sort, details get forgotten ... Thanks for the reminder. >> $ m

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2010-03-24 12:07, Bob McGowan wrote: [snip] And, I used VFAT for the filesystem type: That's the key difference, since vfat "is" fat32. $ mount|grep sde /dev/sde on /var/autofs/usb/centon type vfat ... Try this: $ mount -lt vat -- "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-24 Thread Bob McGowan
R. Clayton wrote: > <<--deleted background details-- > > $ ls --block-size=1k -ls > total 896 > 64 -rwxr-xr-x 1 rclayton rclayton 18 2010-03-23 14:42 branniga.htm > 64 -rwxr-xr-x 1 rclayton rclayton 3 2010-03-23 14:42 fig1.gif > 64 -rwxr-xr-x 1 rclayton rclayton 1 2010-03-23 14:42 fig

Re: Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2010-03-24 10:51, R. Clayton wrote: [snip] to an empty 4G thumb drive $ /sbin/fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 4009 MB, 4009754624 bytes 124 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1018 cylinders Units = cylinders of 7688 * 512 = 3936256 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Device Boot S

Flash drive internal fragmentation.

2010-03-24 Thread R. Clayton
[ This isn't really a debian question; it's more of a linux question or maybe a file system question, but because this is the most appropriate of the groups I read, I'll pretend it's really important that this happened on a debian system. ] I tried to copy a 1.4G directory $ du -sh dr-dob