On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 09:07:33AM -0600, Richard C. Cobbe wrote:
> > Lo, on Wednesday, March 21, Stan Brown did write:
<...>
> I know a little bit about this, being pedantic enough to want to set up
> X 'correctly'.
<...>
> resolution by gimp's monito
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 09:07:33AM -0600, Richard C. Cobbe wrote:
> Lo, on Wednesday, March 21, Stan Brown did write:
>
> > On Wed Mar 21 22:13:32 2001 Richard C. Cobbe wrote...
> > >
> > >Lo, on Wednesday, March 21, Stan Brown did write:
> > >
> > >[reformatted for 80 cols]
> > >
> > >> How can I
Lo, on Wednesday, March 21, Stan Brown did write:
> On Wed Mar 21 22:13:32 2001 Richard C. Cobbe wrote...
> >
> >Lo, on Wednesday, March 21, Stan Brown did write:
> >
> >[reformatted for 80 cols]
> >
> >> How can I set up X properly so that the fonts are displayed in the proper
> >> (eg 1/72 inch
On Wed Mar 21 22:13:32 2001 Richard C. Cobbe wrote...
>
>Lo, on Wednesday, March 21, Stan Brown did write:
>
>[reformatted for 80 cols]
>
>> How can I set up X properly so that the fonts are displayed in the proper
>> (eg 1/72 inch per point) size?
>
>Can't do 72dpi, but you can do 75dpi, which is
Lo, on Wednesday, March 21, Stan Brown did write:
[reformatted for 80 cols]
> How can I set up X properly so that the fonts are displayed in the proper
> (eg 1/72 inch per point) size?
Can't do 72dpi, but you can do 75dpi, which is close enough. Take a look
at your font path (in /etc/X11/XF86Co
How can I set up X properly so that the fonts are displayed in the proper (eg
1/72
inch per point) size?
--
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
--
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions
6 matches
Mail list logo