x27;t tried
> > > this myself, I would expect this to be the reason why you were not
> > > able to apply the freeswan patch.
> >
> > I had read that Debian kernels included a backport of IPsec from 2.6
> > and originally tried setting up freeswan without it. Howev
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:13:47AM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > The Debian kernel is already patched to include a backport of the
> > IPsec implementation from Linux 2.6. Although I havent't tried this
> > myself, I would expect this to be the reason why you were not able to
Jacob S wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
are people using?
I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
while applying the patches. I'm using the provided debia
On Fri, 20 May 2005 11:21:30 +0200
Mirko Parthey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:21:22PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4
> > kernel are people using?
> >
> > I've been tryi
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:21:22PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
> are people using?
>
> I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
> kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
Hello,
Is anyone using Freeswan with a 2.4.27 kernel? If not, what 2.4 kernel
are people using?
I've been trying to patch kernel-source-2.4.27 using
kernel-patch-freeswan and freeswan-modules-source, but keep failing
while applying the patches. I'm using the provided debian/rules i
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Last I heard (and this was a while back, pardon me if it's been fixed
> since then), openswan didn't have support for cyphers other than 3DES,
> e.g., AES, like freeswan does.
http://www.openswan.org/docs/feature_comparison.php
--
Hasso Tepper
Last I heard (and this was a while back, pardon me if it's been fixed
since then), openswan didn't have support for cyphers other than 3DES,
e.g., AES, like freeswan does.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ather late in the release process, but I really
think it'll be better this way.
If nobody wants to argue in favor of it, I hereby request freeswan to be
removed from the archive (unstable and testing). (Please read further before
actually doing it or starting to flame. Thanks.)
Reasoning: f
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 06:51:25PM +, Alexey Toptygin wrote:
>
> I've been trying to get the freeswan modules to compile against various
> 2.6.8 kernels in testing, with no luck. I've been trying from both
> kernel-patch-freeswan (which dies with an unknown make t
Alexey Toptygin wrote:
> I've been trying to get the freeswan modules to compile against various
> 2.6.8 kernels in testing, with no luck. I've been trying from both
> kernel-patch-freeswan (which dies with an unknown make target) and
> freeswan-patches-source (which ca
I've been trying to get the freeswan modules to compile against various
2.6.8 kernels in testing, with no luck. I've been trying from both
kernel-patch-freeswan (which dies with an unknown make target) and
freeswan-patches-source (which cannot find a Rules.make)
Has anyone had su
On Sarge, I just used 'apt-get install freeswan' (shortly after upgrading all
existing packages), and the apt-get is hanging at this step: "Unpacking
freeswan (from .../freeswan_2.04-11_i386.deb) ..."
(has been doing nothing for about 30 minutes).
Here is the apt-get outp
On Sarge, I just used 'apt-get install freeswan' (shortly after upgrading all
existing packages), and the apt-get is hanging at this step: "Unpacking
freeswan (from .../freeswan_2.04-11_i386.deb) ..."
(has been doing nothing for about 30 minutes).
Here is the apt-get outp
(A late reply)
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:41:46AM -0800, Adam Morley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a server where I'd like to be able to use functionality
> provided by later versions of the freeswan kernel patch --- namely,
> 0.9.14 of the X.509 patches provided support for
Hi,
I have a server where I'd like to be able to use functionality provided by later
versions of the freeswan kernel patch --- namely, 0.9.14 of the X.509 patches provided
support for the leftprotoport/rightprotoport.
(http://www.strongsec.com/freeswan/install.htm#section_4.5).
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Antony Gelberg wrote:
| Anyone using the freeswan 2.01 from backports.org? I have:
| deb http://www.backports.org/debian stable freeswan
| deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian stable freeswan
| at the top of my sources.list.
|
| However, upon
Hi all,
Anyone using the freeswan 2.01 from backports.org? I have:
deb http://www.backports.org/debian stable freeswan
deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian stable freeswan
at the top of my sources.list.
However, upon make-kpkg...
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-patches/all
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:22:53PM -0400, Mark Roach wrote:
> Does anyone know the status of the freeswan packages in unstable? I have
> tried them against both the debian and pristine versions of 2.4.21 and
> 2.4.22 with no success. Has anyone gotten this to work properly? I like
>
Does anyone know the status of the freeswan packages in unstable? I have
tried them against both the debian and pristine versions of 2.4.21 and
2.4.22 with no success. Has anyone gotten this to work properly? I like
to keep my kernels packaged with make-kpkg and I would like to avoid
using
Hi.
I'm using Debian Woody with kernel 2.4.18. I want to set-up the VPN
(FreeSWan) on my box. So I installed freeswan backport from Sid to Woody
(APT: deb http://www.backports.org/debian
./dists/woody/freeswan/binary-i386/).
I installed the following packages:
# dpkg -l |grep
Hello all:
Debian woody kernel 2.4.20 unstable
Previously was using kernel 2.4.21 unstable with no errors. I wanted to
use freeswan, and it will only compile against 2.4.20.
So I compiled the standard debian way with initrd and freeswan patch
(freeswan 2.01)
Syslog is now a mess, and the
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 01:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> found this to be a known bug:
> #200033: freeswan-modules-source: failure compiling against 2.4.21
> Package: freeswan-modules-source; Reported by:
> =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Torkelsson?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 33 days old.
Th
found this to be a known bug:
#200033: freeswan-modules-source: failure compiling against 2.4.21
Package: freeswan-modules-source; Reported by:
=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Torkelsson?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 33 days old.
thanks
> I also receive the same with just:
> fakeroot make-kpkg m
/pathdown.sh:
> Permission denied
> **
>
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.21/Documentation/DocBook'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.21'
> echo done > stamp-kernel-configure
> echo
ernel-source-2.4.21'
echo done > stamp-kernel-configure
echo done > stamp-configure
for module in /usr/src/modules/freeswan ; do\
if test -d $module; then\
(cd $module; \
Hi...
I compiled a 2.4.21 kernel and the freeswan-modules package (2.01-1). There
were no errors during compilation, but now there are unresolved symbols in
ipsec.o:
# modprobe ipsec
/lib/modules/2.4.21-chicago-swan/kernel/net/ipsec/ipsec.o: unresolved symbol
ip_send
/lib/modules/2.4.21
also sprach Jamin W. Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.16.1709 +0200]:
> Then the message was a peronsal message not a list message and thus the
> filtering on list headers is not "unreliable" it worked perfectly.
> Messages to the list end in the list box, messages to me end in a
> personal box
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:31:30AM -0500, Alan Shutko wrote:
> "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Since when is a list header from a known list "unreliable"?
>
> Since people may cc you personally, giving a transit path for a
> message which does not contain said header. In oth
"Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since when is a list header from a known list "unreliable"?
Since people may cc you personally, giving a transit path for a
message which does not contain said header. In other words, the
reason this subthread exists.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROT
also sprach Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.16.0251 +0200]:
> Basically what's happening is that FreeS/WAN very emphatically
> refuses to accept any contributions from US citizens.
I usually support any political statement against the US government,
the Patriot Act, etc. because I b
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:46:03PM -0500, Alan Shutko wrote:
> "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Not if you sort your mail by list headers rather than unreliable To: or
> > Cc: header lines.
>
> Obviously both are unreliable. So sort on both.
Since when is a list header from
nt reason for me to never
> use FreeS/WAN.
It's very true. But don't take my word for it it's all over the freeswan
mailing lists, ever since I started checking it out a couple years ago...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noah L. Meyerhans writes:
> Basically what's happening is that FreeS/WAN very emphatically refuses to
> accept any contributions from US citizens.
That's utterly asinine. If true it is sufficient reason for me to never
use FreeS/WAN.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, W
. The David Miller, who is
basically *the* Linux network stack guru, is a US citizen, freeswan's
position didn't sit well with him. Of course, the kernel developers
could have forked freeswan; why they didn't I don't know.
Basically, you have to look at freeswan as a polit
"Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not if you sort your mail by list headers rather than unreliable To: or
> Cc: header lines.
Obviously both are unreliable. So sort on both.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I am the rocks.
"Oh boy, I'm supposed to speak Italian." -- Sam Beck
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:17:01PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:02:42PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> > Both messages will be identical except for the "Received" headers!
> > Procmail should put both in the same place, since if the message is
> > addressed to you, and
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:02:42PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Both messages will be identical except for the "Received" headers!
> Procmail should put both in the same place, since if the message is
> addressed to you, and the list, both messages will have the same
> contents in To: and Cc:. They
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:02:53AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.15.2358 +0200]:
> > If you read the mailing list you'll see many flame wars about
> > this. Also, it was mentioned on LKML before the competing IPsec
> > was merged too.
>
> I do
also sprach Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.15.2358 +0200]:
> If you read the mailing list you'll see many flame wars about
> this. Also, it was mentioned on LKML before the competing IPsec
> was merged too.
I don't read either anymore. I guess I'll get at the archives when
I have some ti
peting IPsec was merged too.
>
> > I'm going to be using freeswan for a while also, but I'm going to
> > be helping to test 2.6-test ipsec to make sure it will be useful
> > at 2.6.0. :)
>
> Of course I will do the same. I am interested in using "nativ
ainline kernel.
I haven't followed this at all. Is there a comprehensive link?
> I'm going to be using freeswan for a while also, but I'm going to
> be helping to test 2.6-test ipsec to make sure it will be useful
> at 2.6.0. :)
Of course I will do the same. I am interested
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:52:11PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.13.1935 +0200]:
> > Yeah, I'm not too happy about how freeswan is handled right now, either.
>
> I just talked to Rene. the 1.99 to 2.0 switch r
also sprach Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.13.1935 +0200]:
> Yeah, I'm not too happy about how freeswan is handled right now, either.
I just talked to Rene. the 1.99 to 2.0 switch requires a rewrite of
the kernel-patch. Thus it will take a little longer. But there wi
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 02:59:04PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Rene isn't answering my mails. What happened to the FreeS/WAN kernel
> patches? kernel-patch-freeswan-ext is gone, and
> kernel-patch-freeswan is back to 1.96 (with 1.99 being the current
> version). Moreover,
Rene isn't answering my mails. What happened to the FreeS/WAN kernel
patches? kernel-patch-freeswan-ext is gone, and
kernel-patch-freeswan is back to 1.96 (with 1.99 being the current
version). Moreover, freeswan-modules-source seems to be new.
I hope that Debian doesn't expect peo
ich has a command
> called apt-get. apt-get is the most wonderful thing. Try the following:
>
> apt-get install freeswan
>
> And that's that. It will manage all the dependencies.
Unless you want your machine to be half woody, half sid, I would
strongly recommend against
ebian must have a better way.
>
Are you using apt-get? There is a system called apt which has a command
called apt-get. apt-get is the most wonderful thing. Try the following:
apt-get install freeswan
And that's that. It will manage all the dependencies.
rgh
>
>
--
&qu
This is a really basic question but I just can't seem to find an answers
I think I'm just looking in the wrong direction. any advice would
greatly appreciated.
I want to install freeswan_1.99-6_i386.deb(unstable) in my woody
system how do I solve the dependency problems? Ive tried download
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 February 2003 15:03, thing wrote:
> whats the sequence of commands to patch please?
What do you mean?
1. How to patch a standard kernel with the debian freeswan patch, or
2. how to patch an already patched freeswan kernel w
whats the sequence of commands to patch please?
Thing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all.
I use stable (woody), kernel source 2.4.19 and 2.4.20
I applied kernel-patch-freeswan/stable uptodate 1.96-1.4 on my system.
I try to build a kernel with the following kommand:
make-kpkg --added-patches freeswan kernel_image kernel_headers
My /etc/kernel-pkg.conf:
patch_the_kernel
I have installed the kernel-patch-freeswan-ext !
In fact, the make-pkgp ask me for setting some building option and I have replied m
for the cryptoapi option (CONFIG_IPSEC_ALG_CRYPTOAPI=m).
I have rebuilt the kernel unseting this option and it works now ;-)
My new chalenge is to understand
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:14:42PM +0100, Francois Chenais wrote:
> I just have install the kernel-patch-freeswan but the building process
> fails because it doesn't find linux/crypto.h.
Hmm... How did you actually apply the patch?
> The warning message says to install cryptoap
Hello,
I just have install the kernel-patch-freeswan but the building process fails because
it doesn't find linux/crypto.h.
The warning message says to install cryptoapi.
I have run apt-get install cryptoapi-core-source but what must I do now with the
/usr/src/cryptoapi-core.tar.gz file
hentication.
start off with pre-shared, get it working. only then worry about
x.509. also: get on freeswan-users, which is incredibly helpful!
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when
also sprach Ionel Mugurel Ciobica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.02.2232 +0100]:
> Also I don't understand this: "Insert the record into DNS, or have a
> system adminstrator do it for you." There is no way that the sysadmin
> will enetr something in the DNS, only because I say so...
so don't use opp
also sprach Ionel Mugurel Ciobica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.02.2209 +0100]:
> Is someone using ipsec from freeswan?
yes.
> I run stable, and I tried the freeswan 1.96, but when I go through the
> documentations it says to run ipsec verify,
try
ipsec whack --status
ipsec ve
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:32:50PM +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote:
> > Have you patched and recompiled your kernel? You need to install the
> > kernel-patch-freeswan package and go through the steps to build a kernel
> > that includes it. The kernel-package package will
On 2-12-2002, at 16h 23'54", Noah L. Meyerhans wrote to liste about "Re: ipsec
(freeswan)"
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:09:39PM +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote:
> > I run stable, and I tried the freeswan 1.96, but when I go through the
> > documentations
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:09:39PM +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote:
> I run stable, and I tried the freeswan 1.96, but when I go through the
> documentations it says to run ipsec verify, which give me the error
> that verify is not an option. I took the tar file from freeswan site
&g
Hi,
Is someone using ipsec from freeswan?
I run stable, and I tried the freeswan 1.96, but when I go through the
documentations it says to run ipsec verify, which give me the error
that verify is not an option. I took the tar file from freeswan site
and I did make install. Now I have the verify
Can I use a FQDN in my ipsec.conf file for, in my case, the right=
paramater.
i.e., right=mydomain.name.com
Curtis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r to indicate that the x509 patch was not actually
installed correctly. How did you install it? Did you use the
maintainers 'apply' script (in
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/apply/freeswan)? If not, I'd give that a
try.
What does 'dmesg | grep klips' tell you? If you see l
All,
I have installed the source for freeswan (woody) on my potato box and compiled
it.
When I add the following lines to my secrets file:
# This file holds shared secrets or RSA private keys for inter-Pluto
# authentication. See ipsec_pluto(8) manpage, and HTML documentation.
: RSA /etc
t;:
Having compiled a 2.4.18 kernel with Freeswan I discover the following
problem:
When I try to give the command, for example: ipchains -P forward DENY
I get an error: "ipchains: Protocol not available"
But I see that I the ipchains packet installed. There isn't an ipchains
So, iptables replace ipchains?
Mike Egglestone wrote:
Hi,
You many want to look at using iptables with kernel 2.4.x
Cheers,
Mike
Quoting curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Having compiled a 2.4.18 kernel with Freeswan I discover the following
problem:
When I try to give the command, for e
Hi,
You many want to look at using iptables with kernel 2.4.x
Cheers,
Mike
Quoting curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Having compiled a 2.4.18 kernel with Freeswan I discover the following
> problem:
>
> When I try to give the command, for example: ipchains -P forward DEN
Having compiled a 2.4.18 kernel with Freeswan I discover the following
problem:
When I try to give the command, for example: ipchains -P forward DENY
I get an error: "ipchains: Protocol not available"
But I see that I the ipchains packet installed. There isn't an ipchains
t
I'd be grateful for any advice on which kernel version to choose to
support the following:
ext3
freeswan
ipchains
and the usual mac hardware support stuff for a pismo.
Also, I'd be grateful to know what I should download to support firewire
disks (i
When you chose to install freeswan you are told taht you will need to
build your own kernel by installing the kernel-source package and
kernel-patch-freeswan, which cn be automatically applied when using
make-kpkg.
Well, that's just great. What the hell does it mean?
Ok, I have the k
* [my private subnet = rightsubnet]
Martin Edward John Waller wrote:
> --
>
> Subject: FreeS/Wan and masquerdaing routing question... (was desperate for
> help! freeswan attempt: can exhange keys but no access to other net
> aft
--- Begin Message ---
John Sullivan wrote:
>
>
> It looks like you're sending SYN packets but
> never receiving an ACK. My guess would be that
> the internal device does not know how to get to
> 192.168.201.0/24 or it does know but it knows
> wrongly, i.e., some router is sending the
> packets t
enpoint-to-endpoint transport
mode on some systems and have no trouble with the routing tables. I
don't currently have a working setup between two hosts on the same
subnet, but I've done it before. I'll set it up again and see what
happens.
> It's freeswan 1.96 BTW.
Tha
but I can't seem to
get a netmask of 255.255.255.255 in the route tables.
Try telling Freeswan to use transport mode instead of the default tunnel
mode for ESP encapsulation. Add 'type=transport' to the conn section
for this link. Don't add any subnet or nexthop lines.
Le
;t seem to
> get a netmask of 255.255.255.255 in the route tables.
Try telling Freeswan to use transport mode instead of the default tunnel
mode for ESP encapsulation. Add 'type=transport' to the conn section
for this link. Don't add any subnet or nexthop lines.
Let me know i
. My
/etc/ipsec.conf looks like this (see end of message). I've tried with
and without the leftsubnet and rightsubnet settings but I can't seem to
get a netmask of 255.255.255.255 in the route tables.
I'm using debian 2.4.18-585tsc kernels and have applied the freeswan
patch
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 02:51:14PM +, Martin Edward John Waller wrote:
> I'd like to install freeswan on a woody machine,
> but a package search for it cam up with nothing.
It was recently removed from woody due to an outstanding release
critical bug. The bug turned out to not be
| On my favorite woody machine...
|
| cyberanarchy:~$ apt-cache search freeswan
| freeswan - IPSEC utilities for FreeSWan
| kernel-patch-freeswan - IPSEC kernel support for FreeSwan
Oops, I forgot that I have a touch of sid in this box... It is in unstable
only, or so it seems.
Sorry,
Brooks
| Hello,
|
| I'd like to install freeswan on a woody machine,
| but a package search for it cam up with nothing.
|
| Is there a freeswan package at all?
| Do I need a 2.4 kernel? (if so, any issues
| upgrading from a 2.2 kernel to a 2.4 kernel on
| woody?)
| Is there a noddy guide to isnta
Hi Martin!
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Martin Edward John Waller wrote:
> I'd like to install freeswan on a woody machine,
> but a package search for it cam up with nothing.
>
> Is there a freeswan package at all?
> Do I need a 2.4 kernel? (if so, any issues
> upgrading fro
Hello,
I'd like to install freeswan on a woody machine,
but a package search for it cam up with nothing.
Is there a freeswan package at all?
Do I need a 2.4 kernel? (if so, any issues
upgrading from a 2.2 kernel to a 2.4 kernel on
woody?)
Is there a noddy guide to isntalling it on
d the
kernel-patch-freeswan package. You then need to compile a kernel and
patch in the freeswan support. The readme talks about this.
-Bryan
I recommend using the freeswan stuff from www.freeswan.org instead of
the stuff packaged with Debian. Read their documentation for info on
patching the kernel. However, if you do decide to use Debian's freeswan
packages, they install kernel patches in /usr/src/kern
Hi,
I was trying to install the .deb, but I had the following:
Kernel support for IPSec not found, aborting.
What kernel version should I use?
TIA,
Oki
tter and easier to set up than the official Alcatel drivers... have a
look at his site for all the instructions:
http://benoit.papillault.free.fr/speedtouch/index.en.php3
> Secondly (or thirdly I suppose) has anyone got FreeSWAN to work under
> potato? Say if I install it myself?
I
> Can I get ASDL with British Telecom to work under potato, and if so how?
The short answer is no, you need a 2.4 kernel to get the USB Alcatel
Speedtouch modem to work for more info check out the url below.
http://www.linuxdude.co.uk/docs/Alcatel-Speedtouch-USB-mini-HOWTO/speedtouchusb.html
Hello,
Two (well 3 I suppose) questions.
Can I get ASDL with British Telecom to work under potato, and if so how?
Otherwise, how hard is ISDN to get working?
Secondly (or thirdly I suppose) has anyone got FreeSWAN to work under
potato? Say if I install it myself?
Ta,
Martin
Hi,
Does anyone have freeswan working on debian? Is there a package or list
of steps to get it installed anywhere? I've got the kernel images built,
but don't have the startup scripts working yet.
I didn't see anything in the archives and couldn't get the search
function on
89 matches
Mail list logo
