ScruLoose wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 06:32:21PM -0800, Raquel Rice wrote:
Oh gosh. I'm just trying to figure out apt and now I'm hearing
about aptitude in this post and a prior post. Is aptitude really
that much better? I tried the Debian site for more information, but
it seems that was
Hi
I've got a couple of systems running on Debian sarge/testing and would
prefer to have them on stable, but with the upcoming transition of sarge
to stable, it's not worth the effort to reinstall the machines using
woody, since I hope to be able to stick with sarge and thereby transit
from
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:57:24AM +0100, Tobias Reckhard wrote:
Hi
I've got a couple of systems running on Debian sarge/testing and would
prefer to have them on stable, but with the upcoming transition of sarge
to stable, it's not worth the effort to reinstall the machines using
woody,
Er... I think I misunderstood you.
You want to just stay with sarge while it's testing and keep it when it
becomes stable too? Yeah, you can just use 'sarge' in sources.list.
The code names (woody, sarge, etc) work as well as stable / testing /
unstable.
--
Nick Welch aka mackstann | mack @
Nick Welch wrote:
Er... I think I misunderstood you.
Yep.
You want to just stay with sarge while it's testing and keep it when it
becomes stable too?
Exactly.
Yeah, you can just use 'sarge' in sources.list.
The code names (woody, sarge, etc) work as well as stable / testing /
unstable.
Good.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:37:52PM -0800, Raquel Rice wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:30:24 +0100 Tobias Reckhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Welch wrote:
You want to just stay with sarge while it's testing and keep it
when it becomes stable too?
Exactly.
Yeah, you can just
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 06:32:21PM -0800, Raquel Rice wrote:
Oh gosh. I'm just trying to figure out apt and now I'm hearing
about aptitude in this post and a prior post. Is aptitude really
that much better? I tried the Debian site for more information, but
it seems that was also affected
7 matches
Mail list logo
