Charles Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out
> the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were
> needed in slink and not potato I don't know.
It's a kernel issue. Linux 2.2.x automatically adds
Yep. Looks like the 2.2.x series is smart enought not to
need them. Course, I still include them for completion's
sake.
Bryan
On 20-Oct-99 Colin Marquardt wrote:
> * Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out
>> t
* Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out
> the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were
> needed in slink and not potato I don't know.
--^^^-^^--
--ke
The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out
the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were
needed in slink and not potato I don't know.
===
Charles Lewis, Director of Administrative Computing
So
4 matches
Mail list logo