Re: Fw: SIOCADDRT

1999-10-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
Charles Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out > the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were > needed in slink and not potato I don't know. It's a kernel issue. Linux 2.2.x automatically adds

Re: Fw: SIOCADDRT

1999-10-21 Thread Bryan Scaringe
Yep. Looks like the 2.2.x series is smart enought not to need them. Course, I still include them for completion's sake. Bryan On 20-Oct-99 Colin Marquardt wrote: > * Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out >> t

Re: Fw: SIOCADDRT

1999-10-20 Thread Colin Marquardt
* Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out > the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were > needed in slink and not potato I don't know. --^^^-^^-- --ke

Fw: SIOCADDRT

1999-10-20 Thread Charles Lewis
The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were needed in slink and not potato I don't know. === Charles Lewis, Director of Administrative Computing So