On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:57:06PM -0600, ktb wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:41:57PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:47:00PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > > iface eth1 inet static
> > > address 192.168.1.1
> > > netmask 255.255.255.0
> > > network 192.168.0.0
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:30:54PM -0600, ktb wrote:
> >
> > # The loopback interface
> > iface lo inet loopback
> >
> > # The ethernet interface, configured by etherconf
> > iface eth0 inet static
> > address 24.14.246.95
> > netmask 255.255.255.128
> > gateway 24.14.246.1
> >
> > i
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:41:57PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:47:00PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > iface eth1 inet static
> > address 192.168.1.1
> > netmask 255.255.255.0
> > network 192.168.0.0
> > broadcast 192.168.1.255
>
> This is wrong. Well,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:47:00PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 192.168.1.1
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.0.0
> broadcast 192.168.1.255
This is wrong. Well, I don't have experience that indicates that it
doesn't *work*, but it's sti
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:47:00PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> Trying again No response on first attempt, which is odd for
> this list, so I'm sending again. Any help is HUGELY appreciated.
>
> - Forwarded message from JD Kitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> After considerable mucking around a
Trying again No response on first attempt, which is odd for
this list, so I'm sending again. Any help is HUGELY appreciated.
- Forwarded message from JD Kitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
After considerable mucking around and a great deal of help from this
group some time back, I had connec
6 matches
Mail list logo