Hi
Following my offer, quite a few of your requested gmail invites to be
sent. I _think_ I got around to you all, but if you asked for an invite
and didn't receive one, please remind me off list.
Thanks
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam anti-virus
Carl Fûrstenberg wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:40:52 +0100, robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cr wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500 Rodney Richison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com) They are a
cr wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500
Rodney Richison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:40:52 +0100, robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cr wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500 Rodney Richison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com) They are a VERY
qualified
Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Who are you trying to fool? Your site is a pathetic bare bones sample,
probably not even paid for yet as evidenced by the little, default
theme sample tag in the lower left corner of /every page/. There is
/no/ content yet you expect people on this list to listen to you
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500
Rodney Richison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
though) :)
The preferred method
Rodney Richison wrote:
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
though) :)
The preferred method is top posting.
The preferred format is to allow html.
Is it just me, or did you just install a fresh copy of
On Wednesday October 6 at 02:30pm
Mark Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it just me, or did you just install a fresh copy of Apache?
Totally no site anymore?
Thats what it looks like, but the server-signature is
Apache/1.3.31 Server at www.channelvar.com Port 80
and the folder is
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying let's use a forum or something
because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
forum works with bottom posting and everybody seems to find that
normal.
I run a list for
Incoming from Rodney Richison:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying let's use a forum or something
because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
forum works with bottom posting and everybody seems to find
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500, Rodney Richison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
though) :)
The preferred method is top posting.
The preferred format is to allow html.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:05:22PM +0100, Daniel Goldsmith wrote:
pace the whole GMail issue - I use it for mailing lists, for pretty
much the same reasons to do with wastage. I simply cannot afford the
bandwidth to download much of the crud which populates mailing-lists -
Google Inc. can.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:24:10AM -0500, Rodney Richison wrote:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying let's use a forum or something
because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
forum works with bottom
Rodney Richison wrote:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying let's use a forum or something
because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
forum works with bottom posting and everybody seems to find that
normal.
On (05/10/04 12:52), Nate Duehr wrote:
Rodney Richison wrote:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying let's use a forum or something
because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
forum works with bottom
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:32 pm, calvin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:24:10AM -0500, Rodney Richison wrote:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying let's use a forum or something
because they can't follow the thread any
Bob Underwood wrote:
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:32 pm, calvin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:24:10AM -0500, Rodney Richison wrote:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying let's use a forum or something
because they can't
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500
Rodney Richison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
though) :)
The preferred method is top posting.
The preferred format is to allow html.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman said
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Every single technical list (far too many) I'm on is
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:57:41 +1000, Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman said
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:19:43 +0200
Wim De Smet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:57:41 +1000, Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman said
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience -
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
Have those posting their invites acutally READ
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
gmail invites do not remotely fall within that policy.
Whether gmail sends them itself, it's
Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
[...]
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Top posting may work. But I think
On 13-09-2004, at 23h 14'49, Patrick Wiseman wrote about Re: [Way OT] Re: GMAIL
Invites..!
Even relatively undisciplined correspondents don't make that kind of
mess. And my _top_ posting might just clarify for anyone who's
joining this way-OT-aside what we're discussing. _Insisting_
their invites acutally READ
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
gmail invites do not remotely fall within that policy.
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists
Andrew A. Raines [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Nothing but quoted text.]
Sigh. I've put this off long enough.
(defun aar-dont-send-yet-stupid ()
Dang, C-c C-c is easy to hit.
(interactive)
(message Type M-x message-send-and-exit...))
(define-key message-mode-map \C-c\C-c
* matt okeson-harlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040912 21:42]:
for those bashing on google... have you actually READ the faq's re
privacy and security?
Have those posting their invites acutally READ
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
gmail invites do not remotely fall within that policy.
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Not in my experience. As a third-party reader, where do you start in the
following dialog, and
Kent West wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Not in my experience. As a third-party reader, where do you start in
the
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Not in my experience. As a third-party reader, where do you
Even relatively undisciplined correspondents don't make that kind of
mess. And my _top_ posting might just clarify for anyone who's
joining this way-OT-aside what we're discussing. _Insisting_ on
bottom posting is, in my view, silly. We should trust each other to
be clear. But it's this list's
On Monday September 13 at 10:37pm
Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail-Followup-To: is better than Reply-To: for mailing lists, see
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
gmail invites do not remotely fall within
I wouldn't mind top posters so much if they would trim the quoted
portion of the reply. Top posting makes it easier to forget and include
the entire message, which in most cases is unnecessary.
--
-johann koenig
Now Playing: At the Driv-in - Catacomb : Plea For Peace - Take Action
(Vol. 1)
Today
for those bashing on google... have you actually READ the faq's re
privacy and security?
guess not
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:05:03 +0300, Hasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'r right , google is very very clever . He knows the rules of the game.
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Saturday September 11
On Sunday September 12 at 02:42pm
matt okeson-harlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for those bashing on google... have you actually READ the faq's re
privacy and security?
I have. I don't care. I just don't like Gmail invites showing up
everywhere. Maybe you meant to reply to the *other* messages
On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GMail
Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
--
-johann koenig
Today is Pungenday, the 34th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3170
My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/
Johann Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GMail
Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
I suggest that we start a new debian list called
debian-spam-gmail_invites.
I am amazed that so many
On 11 Sep 2004 09:17:51 -0700
Carl Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johann Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GMail
Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
I suggest that we start a
You'r right , google is very very clever . He knows the rules of the game.
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GMail
Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All,
I have more then a few GMail invites.
but rule of the game is FCFS.
--
Nayyar Ahmad
Lecturer
Faculty Of Computer Science,
Institute Of Management Sciences,
Hayat Abad Peshawar , Pakistan.
Office : 92-091-9217404 , 9217452
Cell : 92-0333-9139461
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I've got 6 of 'em
Please reply off list if you want one (first come first served)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All,
I have GMail invites. those who left that day are highly appriciated.
But the game rule is same FIRST COME FIRST SERVER -;)
--
Nayyar Ahmad
Lecturer
Faculty Of Computer Science,
Institute Of Management Sciences,
Hayat Abad Peshawar , Pakistan.
Office : 92-091-9217404 , 9217452
Cell
Hello All,
If any body need gmail account send me a mail .
on the bases of FIrst Come First Serve... ;)
--
Nayyar Ahmad
Lecturer
Faculty Of Computer Science,
Institute Of Management Sciences,
Hayat Abad Peshawar , Pakistan.
Office : 92-091-9217404 , 9217452
Cell : 92-0333-9139461
--
To
Jeff Elkins wrote:
Thanks to this list for all the help over the years. Here are ten gmail
invites.
Thank you!
I wanted to thank you via gmail, but I get
Server Error
The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your
request.
Please try again in 30 seconds.
Google
Thanks to this list for all the help over the years. Here are ten gmail
invites.
Jeff Elkins
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-393ce3cb67-c434e4a09c-379c78ef27
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-393ce3cb67-9ede1d9490-12a92af7ec
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-393ce3cb67-534ab78e38-0c6cd8bf4a
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:38:26 -0700, Daved Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you've misunderstood the concept of Beta. :)
Uh, no. Been on quite a few betas in my time.
If you think it lacks features or doesnt work how it would best suit
you have you botherd to send a feature
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:36:59 -0700, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:38:26 -0700, Daved Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you've misunderstood the concept of Beta. :)
Uh, no. Been on quite a few betas in my time.
I was jokingly saying that, not at all
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:26:15 +0800, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
Spammer
Not really. To thoese 6 new gmail users, it's not. He may want to
label this kind of email as [OT],
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:26:15PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
Spammer
Your reply contributes about as much on-topic discussion as his original
post did.
--
Jon Dowland
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:21:48PM -0500 or thereabouts, James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
I do not have anymore invitations right now. If there are others
interested in them please drop me a simple message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll send some out as soon as I get them.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:44:51 -0400, S.D.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:21:48PM -0500 or
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:03:29AM -0500 or thereabouts, James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I do not have anymore invitations right now. If there are others
interested in them please drop me a simple message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll send some out as soon as I get them.
Thanks James! Sent an
Made a mistake. My address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone who has responded in this thread I have marked for the list.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:19:27 -0400, S.D.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:03:29AM -0500 or thereabouts, James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I do not have anymore
Daved Daly wrote:
Nope because the problem stems from the very core of how they are
doing things.
I'm still not sure, I really understand exactly what you mean there...
The whole archives instead of delete and lack of folders in combination.
Again, I dont exactly get what you mean by
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:14:44 -0700, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no ability to sort on anything other than having each thread
(damn their conversations notion, we need no new terms here!) show up based
Thread is a pretty unintuitive term, conversation is more natural - I
Ricky Clarkson wrote:
Thread is a pretty unintuitive term, conversation is more natural - I
won't have to explain to my parents what conversation means, with any
luck :)
Conversation is unintuative because we're not having one. Conversations
are generally verbal affairs. ;) I might have
On Fri 25 June 2004 00:43, Steve Lamb wrote:
Well, since you broke the ice. I've been less than impressed with
it. Friend of mine sent me an invite 2 days ago. I subscribed 2
whole lists. Moderate volume compared to what I process with
Thunderbird ( sylpheed-claws, mutt, TheBat!, PMMail2k
We're sorry, but we don't seem to be compatible.
Our software suggests that you're using a browser incompatible with
Gmail. Gmail currently supports the following:
Microsoft IE 5.5 and newer (download: Windows)
Netscape 7.1 and newer (download: Windows Macintosh Linux )
Mozilla 1.4 and
25 Jun 2004, 22:47, David P James:
Has anyone who uses GMail been able to use it with Konqueror? It works
with Firefox but with Konqueror, after logging in, I'm sent to a page
that says Loading... in a red field at the top right (which I also
see in Firefox) but I never get any further than that
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
wants them here.
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-5cb03dc1c9-50683ed958
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:21:48 -0500, James W. Thompson, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
wants
James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
wants them here.
D'oh, and forgot to mention in my last
James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
Spammer
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
64 matches
Mail list logo
