On 13/06/10 10:49 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:16:16PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>> On 13/06/10 02:24 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
replying! If you wanted to reply to the OP, you should have done that
>>
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:16:16PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 13/06/10 02:24 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >> replying! If you wanted to reply to the OP, you should have done that
> ^^^
> >> instead
On 13/06/10 02:24 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>> replying! If you wanted to reply to the OP, you should have done that
^^^
>> instead of replying to me. I am not sure which email client you are
>
> Y
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:46:32PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 12/06/10 10:50 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:03:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland uttered:
> >> On 11/06/2010 03:33, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> >>> No it's for Thunderbird.
> >> Therein lies the problem. Are you actually r
On 12/06/10 10:50 AM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:03:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland uttered:
>> On 11/06/2010 03:33, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
>>> No it's for Thunderbird.
>> Therein lies the problem. Are you actually reading H.S.'s posts?
>
> Yes were you? BTW he's not the original
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:03:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland uttered:
> On 11/06/2010 03:33, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > No it's for Thunderbird.
> Therein lies the problem. Are you actually reading H.S.'s posts?
Yes were you? BTW he's not the original poster and I and others were
responding primarily to
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:46:02PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 10/06/10 10:33 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:22:22PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >> On 10/06/10 10:11 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>
> FireGPG wa
On 07.06.2010 20:05, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
> what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
>
> Thanks,
Mozilkla Thunderbird with "Enigmail" add-on. Works fine after some
initial trouble with seahorse and GPG-Agent.
On 6/11/2010 9:11 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:07 PM, H.S. wrote:
>> Just a bit of clarificatino to the OP. Gmail can be read by an email
>> client using IMAP (TB, mutt, what have you). Google provides an imap
>> server imap.gmail.com, port 993.
>
> Neat ! I never real
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:07 PM, H.S. wrote:
> Just a bit of clarificatino to the OP. Gmail can be read by an email
> client using IMAP (TB, mutt, what have you). Google provides an imap
> server imap.gmail.com, port 993.
Neat ! I never realized that !
Thx
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 11/06/10 09:27 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 12:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
>> what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
>
> Thunderbird with the Enigmail extension is by far my favorite tool for
> Gmail and en
On 06/07/2010 12:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
> what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
Thunderbird with the Enigmail extension is by far my favorite tool for
Gmail and encryption/signing (as this email is). When away from
T
On 11/06/2010 03:33, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> No it's for Thunderbird.
Therein lies the problem. Are you actually reading H.S.'s posts?
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On 10/06/10 10:33 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:22:22PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>> On 10/06/10 10:11 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
FireGPG was a pretty neat extension which got around both these problems.
>>>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:22:22PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 10/06/10 10:11 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >>
> >> FireGPG was a pretty neat extension which got around both these problems.
> >
> > So is engimail; I can't see them having any
On 10/06/10 10:11 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>>
>> FireGPG was a pretty neat extension which got around both these problems.
>
> So is engimail; I can't see them having any more difficulty in setting
> it up then any other extension.
Ah!
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:59:44PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
[ ...]
> I realize that, I use both. But I think I already made that clear.
I don't think very much was clear. Anyway you have our suggestions.
> > So what's the problem?
>
> Okay, I will rephrase what I already mentioned in a different
On 09/06/10 09:37 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:41:39PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>> On 08/06/10 10:39 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:08:11AM -0400, H.S. uttered:
Yes, I agree. In fact, if a mail client like TB or mutt can be used,
>>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:41:39PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 08/06/10 10:39 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:08:11AM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >>
> >> Yes, I agree. In fact, if a mail client like TB or mutt can be used,
>
>
> >> there is nothing
On 08/06/10 10:39 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:08:11AM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>>
>> Yes, I agree. In fact, if a mail client like TB or mutt can be used,
>> there is nothing to beat that. However, FireGPG was excellent for people
^^^
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:08:11AM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 07/06/10 11:42 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:10:54PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> >> On 07/06/10 02:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>> Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd l
Op 08-06-10 05:42, Steve Fishpaste schreef:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:10:54PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> When I used TBird there was a GPG extension. Why not use that? Search
> the extension repository.
`aptitude install enigmail`
Sjoerd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/06/10 11:42 PM, Steve Fishpaste wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:10:54PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
>> On 07/06/10 02:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
>>> what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
>>>
>>
>> C
Claws-Mail also
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Steve Fishpaste
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 23:42:34
To:
Subject: Re: GPG / GMail
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:10:54PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 07/06/10 02:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:10:54PM -0400, H.S. uttered:
> On 07/06/10 02:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
> > what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
> >
>
> Crap! I was using Firegpg for mails to my friend
On 07/06/10 02:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
> what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
>
Crap! I was using Firegpg for mails to my friends and family whose
primary mail contact is yahoo or google and Firegpg p
On Lu, 07 iun 10, 20:05:54, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
> what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
The favorite IMAP client ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists
Hi there,
Since firegpg support has been discontinued (*), I'd like to know
what are gmail users favorite gpg tool ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
(*) http://blog.getfiregpg.org/2010/06/07/firegpg-discontinued/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
28 matches
Mail list logo
