In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Martin at cush
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On the release of Hamm I will be taking Win'95 off my 486 and replacing
>> it with Linux (BTW, does 40 meg swap partition sound about right for
>> 8 megs of RAM (total HD si
On Fri, 3 Apr 1998, T-SNAKE wrote:
> > It sounds much too big. I would definitely NOT have swap space more
> > than about twice my physical memory.
>
> Seriously? I've always been told to have around 3X when this little physical
> ram is involved. I have 16MB ram, but my total swap is 48MB.
>
> It sounds much too big. I would definitely NOT have swap space more
> than about twice my physical memory.
Seriously? I've always been told to have around 3X when this little physical
ram is involved. I have 16MB ram, but my total swap is 48MB.
What would be the reson for only 2X?
Chris
--
'\,
Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the release of Hamm I will be taking Win'95 off my 486 and replacing
> it with Linux (BTW, does 40 meg swap partition sound about right for
> 8 megs of RAM (total HD size=340MB)?).
It sounds much too big. I would definitely NOT have swap space more
tha
On the release of Hamm I will be taking Win'95 off my 486 and replacing
it with Linux (BTW, does 40 meg swap partition sound about right for
8 megs of RAM (total HD size=340MB)?).
Before removing Win'95 is there anywhere I can get any information
which may be useful to Linux? I have printed a ful
5 matches
Mail list logo