Another thing that really piss me off is when I want to reply a
message to the list.
Pressing `R` or clicking on `Reply` places the author of the current
email on the `To:` field, not the list address.
Let me know if anyone had a workaround for this in GMail.
Thanks!
--
Vinícius Massuchetto
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Vinicius Massuchetto
viniciusan...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing that really piss me off is when I want to reply a
message to the list.
Pressing `R` or clicking on `Reply` places the author of the current
email on the `To:` field, not the list address.
Let me
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Neal Hogan nealho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Vinicius Massuchetto
viniciusan...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
FYI - The gentoo-users list only sends messages to the list from the
list and doesn't include the OP. So, when you hit reply, it
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Neal Hogan nealho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Vinicius Massuchetto
viniciusan...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
FYI - The gentoo-users list only sends messages to the list from the
list and doesn't include the OP.
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Another thing that really piss me off is when I want to reply a
message to the list.
Pressing `R` or clicking on `Reply` places the author of the current
email on the `To:` field, not the list address.
Let me know if anyone had a workaround for this in GMail.
Neal Hogan wrote:
FYI - The gentoo-users list only sends messages to the list from the
list and doesn't include the OP. So, when you hit reply, it goes to
the list and not the OP (directly).
Vinicius Massuchetto writes:
My experience with mailing lists are generally like that. Is there
any
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Yeah,
That's what I'd call normal list behavoir (reply goes to
list).
All fedora and ubuntu lists, K12ltsp lists, RH lists,
Linguas OS list, lists for projects in which I
participate (OmegaT, Anaphraseus), etc.,
and even professional e-mail lists outside of
2009/10/3 Vinicius Massuchetto viniciusan...@gmail.com:
Another thing that really piss me off is when I want to reply a
message to the list.
Two things piss me off: top posters, and those who do not truncate
their posts, because all they can see is their own words.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:38:03 +0100
Terence terence.j...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Two things piss me off: top posters, and those who do not truncate
their posts, because all they can see is their own words.
Add to that Gmail users who send list mail as Cc: and send the mail to
the original
Tony Baldwin writes:
That's what I'd call normal list behavoir (reply goes to list).
Your reply goes where you send it. If an extra copy is being sent to
the OP it is being sent by your MUA, not by the list. You have your MUA
configured to reply to all and so it is sending one copy to the list
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:43:45 -0500
Cybe R. Wizard cybe_r_wiz...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hello Cybe,
Add to that Gmail users who send list mail as Cc: and send the mail to
the original poster instead of the list (uhum, Terence, for instance).
This invariably breaks my filtering of mail into the
Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:38:03 +0100
Terence terence.j...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Two things piss me off: top posters, and those who do not truncate
their posts, because all they can see is their own words.
Add to that Gmail users who send list mail as Cc: and send the
Your message goes where your MUA sends it. If you don't want it to go
to the OP don't send it there.
--
John Hasler
Ya . . . the more I think about it, it makes better sense to inculde
the OP's email, in case you want to take an OT post offlist . . . a
practice that is underused, IMO.
.
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:38:03 +0100
Terence terence.j...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Two things piss me off: top posters, and those who do
not truncate their posts, because all they can see is
their own words.
Add to that Gmail users who send list mail as Cc: and
send the mail to the
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:25:57 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
Hello Jari,
You should filter with List-Id header. That does not fail.
When somebody replies to my address from a list message, Cc'ing the list
the list ID header doesn't get included as that header is added by the
list
2009/10/3 Cybe R. Wizard cybe_r_wiz...@earthlink.net:
Add to that Gmail users who send list mail as Cc: and send the mail to
the original poster instead of the list (uhum, Terence, for instance).
You're right, pisses me off as well!
I can only plead:
a. Gmail,
b. Fast finger, before I
If someone sends a message to your email address, and a carbon copy to list,
just ignore the direct email, and answer the the list message.
List-Id filters the list copy to the correct folder. The another copy is junk.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:54:06 +0100
Terence terence.j...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies.
;-]
No problem. It's the software. You only expected it to act
correctly. Google needs tons of complaints, though.
Cybe R. Wizard
--
Registered GNU/Linux user # 126326
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:19:53 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
Hello Jari,
If someone sends a message to your email address, and a carbon copy to
list, just ignore the direct email, and answer the the list message.
List-Id filters the list copy to the correct folder. The another copy
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:19:53 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
However, on at least one list I'm on, there are people that *insist* on
only replying privately, not the list. I'm starting to get tired from
the
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:27:05 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Another thing that really piss me off is when I want to reply a
message to the list.
Pressing `R` or clicking on `Reply` places the author of the current
email on the `To:`
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:42:30 +0300, Jari Fredriksson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
Does not help the OP though, unless he reads the GMail with fetchmail into
own machine.
Well; There is a GMail IMAP option the OP could use with an external client.
Far superior in my mind then pop3.
Using
On Sat October 3 2009, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Does not help the OP though, unless he reads the GMail with fetchmail
into own machine.
Well; There is a GMail IMAP option the OP could use with an external
client. Far superior in my mind then pop3.
I use Kontact, and have a gmail IMAP (
S. Fishpaste wrote:
Reply-To-List is built into Thunderbird now isn't it? I thought there had
been some action on this front from the T-Bird developers. I had been
watching this on Bugzilla.
It's present in the version 3 betas, but not yet in the 2.x versions.
--
Odd that we think
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:37:27 -0400
Lee Winter lee.j.i.win...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Lee,
Nah, don't do that.
{snipped}
The sender is the problem, not the message he sent. So make the
message handling his responsibility.
Advice duly noted. I'll have to come up with a suitably cryptic and
2009/9/22 Alexander Kaphuk sashaandta...@gmail.com
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Ter, 22 Set 2009, Alexander Kaphuk wrote:
As far as my initial email being sent three times in a row. I do
apologise for the incident. I didn't do it on purpose though. I was under
the impression that I would
Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
2009/9/22 Alexander Kaphuk sashaandta...@gmail.com
mailto:sashaandta...@gmail.com
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Ter, 22 Set 2009, Alexander Kaphuk wrote:
As far as my initial email being sent three times in a
row. I do
On Ter, 22 Set 2009, Alexander Kaphuk wrote:
As far as my initial email being sent three times in a row. I do
apologise for the incident. I didn't do it on purpose though. I was
under the impression that I would receive a copy of that email
straight after sending it off. I thought that's
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Ter, 22 Set 2009, Alexander Kaphuk wrote:
As far as my initial email being sent three times in a row. I do
apologise for the incident. I didn't do it on purpose though. I was
under the impression that I would receive a copy of that email
straight after sending
29 matches
Mail list logo
