Unimaginable! I reinstalled GNOME3, xorg, started from scratch, short of
reformatting the disk and NO.
In xterm,
$ gnome-terminal
Error constructing proxy for
org.gnome.Terminal:/org/gnome/Terminal/Factory0: Error calling
StartServiceByName for org.gnome.Terminal:
Folks,
I upgraded to jessie a few moments ago and I cannot run gnome-terminal.
What's up?
I ran root-terminal and it broke my desktop completely. What's up?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Am 20.04.2015 um 21:59 schrieb deloptes:
Have you checked what you can do regarding powermanagement - I don't recall
reading this in your postings
$ qdbus --system org.freedesktop.UPower /org/freedesktop/UPower | grep
Hibernate
property read bool org.freedesktop.UPower.CanHibernate
Quoting deloptes delop...@yahoo.com:
looks like gnome specific.
did you check permissions?
I think this was in policykit
Maybe my original post was not clear: Hibernating works perfectly
fine with Gnome 3 on Jessie, only the actual UI element (button)
is missing in the menu. My relative now
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Quoting deloptes delop...@yahoo.com:
looks like gnome specific.
did you check permissions?
I think this was in policykit
Maybe my original post was not clear: Hibernating works perfectly
fine with Gnome 3 on Jessie, only the actual UI element (button)
is missing
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2015-04-17 20:23, deloptes wrote:
I had to downgrade upower package (look for a posting in this forum No
suspend in XFCE without systemd) to get it work again.
It looks like upower dropped the freedesktop actions exposed to dbus and
now the system dows not know of
On 2015-04-17 20:23, deloptes wrote:
I had to downgrade upower package (look for a posting in this forum No
suspend in XFCE without systemd) to get it work again.
It looks like upower dropped the freedesktop actions exposed to dbus and now
the system dows not know of such possibility - however
-status-button/
though. Seems to work fine here on Gnome / Jessie.
That fails my requirement must be in Debian.
RFP https://bugs.debian.org/782741 filed :~)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
://extensions.gnome.org/extension/755/hibernate-status-button/
though. Seems to work fine here on Gnome / Jessie.
That fails my requirement must be in Debian.
RFP https://bugs.debian.org/782741 filed :~)
I had to downgrade upower package (look for a posting in this forum No
suspend in XFCE without systemd
, sleep button and
lid switch events (via dconf-editor or gsettings [1]), ttbomk there is
no config option to adjust gnome-shell and you'll need to resort to a
extension for this.
You can try
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/755/hibernate-status-button/
though. Seems to work fine here on Gnome
Hi,
I just upgraded my relatives notebook from wheezy to jessie,
but now her hibernate option is gone from the right side menu.
There is only shutdown, which changes to suspend with alt.
Both are not needed by my relative, she always wants hibernate.
Any idea how to get this back?
Please without
On 04/16/2015 06:40 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded my relatives notebook from wheezy to jessie,
but now her hibernate option is gone from the right side menu.
There is only shutdown, which changes to suspend with alt.
Both are not needed by my relative, she always wants
Op 02-02-15 om 22:39 schreef Geert Stappers:
Contro: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:41:00PM +0100, Frans Spiesschaert wrote:
Ik heb het probleem voorgelegd aan de debian ontwikkelaars van Gnome
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2015/02/msg0.html) en het
antwoord
Contro: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:41:00PM +0100, Frans Spiesschaert wrote:
Ik heb het probleem voorgelegd aan de debian ontwikkelaars van Gnome
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2015/02/msg0.html) en het
antwoord is dat ze het probleem ernstig genoeg vinden en
On 02/02/2015 11:44 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 02-02-15 om 11:28 schreef Jan-Rens Reitsma:
Volgens mij verwijst https://packages.debian.org/jessie/gnome-menus naar:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-1.0.html
en dat is volgens mij een generieke spec en geen specifieke
Op 02-02-15 om 13:16 schreef Jan-Rens Reitsma:
On 02/02/2015 11:44 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 02-02-15 om 11:28 schreef Jan-Rens Reitsma:
Volgens mij verwijst https://packages.debian.org/jessie/gnome-menus
naar:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-1.0.html
en dat
On 02/01/2015 04:43 PM, Frans Spiesschaert wrote:
Dag Paul,
Frans Spiesschaert schreef op vr 30-01-2015 om 00:21 [+0100]:
Dag Paul,
Paul van der Vlis schreef:
Het lijkt me nu dat het probleem
in het pakket gnome-menus zit:
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/gnome-menus
Ik heb het source
On 02/02/2015 02:08 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 02-02-15 om 13:16 schreef Jan-Rens Reitsma:
knip source links
De screenshots op:
https://screenshots.debian.net/package/gnome-menus
zijn van:
$ alacarte
maar dat staat er niet bij.
Dat is inderdaad niet correct.
Daardoor was ik vanaf
Op 02-02-15 om 16:10 schreef Jan-Rens Reitsma:
On 02/02/2015 02:08 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 02-02-15 om 13:16 schreef Jan-Rens Reitsma:
knip source links
De screenshots op:
https://screenshots.debian.net/package/gnome-menus
zijn van:
$ alacarte
maar dat staat er niet bij.
Dat
Dag Paul,
Frans Spiesschaert schreef op vr 30-01-2015 om 00:21 [+0100]:
Dag Paul,
Paul van der Vlis schreef:
Het lijkt me nu dat het probleem
in het pakket gnome-menus zit:
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/gnome-menus
Ik heb het source-pakket van gnome-menus eens bekeken,
maar
Hoi Frans en anderen,
Op 01-02-15 om 16:43 schreef Frans Spiesschaert:
Ik ben hier wat kort door de bocht gegaan, door in de broncode enkel
naar het debian-specifieke deel te kijken.
De fout blijkt wel degelijk te zitten in gnome-menus, maar dan wel in de
upstream tarball.
De laatste
kunnen worden.
Er is niet iets als een gnome-l10n-nl. Het lijkt me nu dat het probleem
in het pakket gnome-menus zit:
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/gnome-menus
Een volgende keer moet ik eerder goed testen...
Met vriendelijke groet,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux
On Wed, January 28, 2015 23:35, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 28-01-15 om 12:08 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Op 28-01-15 om 10:02 schreef Geert Stappers:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:46:43PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hoi,
Ik zie iets raars in Jessie in Gnome Classic.
In het menu-item
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:46:43PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hoi,
Ik zie iets raars in Jessie in Gnome Classic.
In het menu-item Toepassingen zie ik twee keer het item
Hulpmiddelen. Beide hebben een inhoud, deze is echter niet hetzelfde.
Dit zou een fout in de vertaling kunnen
Op 28-01-15 om 10:02 schreef Geert Stappers:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:46:43PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hoi,
Ik zie iets raars in Jessie in Gnome Classic.
In het menu-item Toepassingen zie ik twee keer het item
Hulpmiddelen. Beide hebben een inhoud, deze is echter niet hetzelfde
Op 28-01-15 om 12:08 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Op 28-01-15 om 10:02 schreef Geert Stappers:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:46:43PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hoi,
Ik zie iets raars in Jessie in Gnome Classic.
In het menu-item Toepassingen zie ik twee keer het item
Hulpmiddelen. Beide
On Saturday 16 August 2014 23:33:54 Charlie wrote:
That's also what I thought? But I assume this thread is pertaining to
the person who installs the software through the installer. Rather than
just a bare bones Debian without any GUI that will boot. Then through
CLI just install the software
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:56:53PM -0400, Stephen L. Novak wrote:
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
interface for jessie too.
Your vote has no affect whatsoever on what the default DE will be.
The only way you can influence the decision is to install
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
highlighter for some of the default menus in the new Xfce to a brighter
color. Thanks for all
On 16/08/14 11:00 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
highlighter for some of the default menus in the new
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
I've never been a fan of Gnome although this stems mainly from my
preference for Konqueror and Dolphin as file managers. They both have
options that I find very helpful, like actually listing the files you
are about to delete instead of just telling you how
Am 16.08.2014 17:00, schrieb Stephen Powell:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
highlighter for some of the default menus in the
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:03:54 -0400 (EDT), Michael Biebl wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
My main objection to GNOME as the default desktop environment is
that it *requires* 3D graphics acceleration from the X driver,
...
Not quite true. On graphics
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:49:23 -0400
Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:56:53 -0400 (EDT), Stephen L. Novak wrote:
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as
On 16/08/14 17:49, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
My main objection to GNOME as the default desktop environment is
that it *requires* 3D graphics acceleration from the X driver,
something which is not available from all
Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:28:56 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:03:54 -0400 (EDT), Michael Biebl wrote:
On Sat, 16
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 19:01:40 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
The installer, to my way of thinking, should either go with the most
popular choice or give you the choice of desktop environments as part of
the install process.
I'm fully in
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
fvwm is wonderful, but not likely to make it into d-i. Back in 1996 it
was a default (on Red Hat at
On Saturday 16 August 2014 18:01:40 Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Anyway, I think the installer should offer *all* the DEs.
*All*, including Mate and Cinnamon and Trinity and Unity, in addition to
Gnome, KDE, LXDE, Xfce, and . etc. ??
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Saturday 16 August 2014 19:14:01 John Holland wrote:
Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
Sorry, I left that one out. It was in the etc.! I knew that I had not got a
complete list.
But the
On Saturday 16 August 2014 20:24:31 Brian wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the installer.
fvwm is wonderful, but not likely to make it into
On 16/08/14 02:56 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 19:01:40 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
The installer, to my way of thinking, should either go with the most
popular choice or give you the choice of desktop environments as part of
the install
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 17:27:27 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
On 16/08/14 02:56 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 19:01:40 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 16/08/14 18:28, Gary Dale wrote:
The installer, to my way of thinking, should either go with the most
popular choice or give you the
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 21:32:23 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2014 20:24:31 Brian wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with reasonable hardware
requirements. It'd be nice to have it as an option in the
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:57:17 +0100
Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 21:32:23 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2014 20:24:31 Brian wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2014 at 14:14:01 -0400, John Holland wrote:
Enlightenment is actually a very nice DE with
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 21:32:23 +0100 Lisi Reisz sent:
Here's an idea: Why not give users a choice (if they want it) after
they have installed the OS? Or even before? Installation of a
desktop environment shouldn't be obligatory.
It isn't.
Lisi
That's also what I thought? But I assume
I'm only submitting that I would vote to see gnome as the default
interface for jessie too. Also, I would vote change the default
highlighter for some of the default menus in the new Xfce to a brighter
color. Thanks for all the work on Wheezy.
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
48 matches
Mail list logo
