Re: Going Unstable

2003-06-25 Thread Roberto Sanchez
--- Bill Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > Is this a good time to move to unstable, or is there breakage right now? > > Should I watch the mailing lists for 12-18 hours after the mirrors update > to see if there are problems? (And what time is that, again?) > > Or am I just being paran

Re: Going Unstable

2003-06-25 Thread Hugh Saunders
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 11:01:04PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote: > On Wednesday 25 June 2003 04:28 am, Bill Morgan wrote: > > > Is this a good time to move to unstable, or is there breakage right now? > > > > Should I watch the mailing lists for 12-18 hours after the mirrors update > > to see if

Re: Going Unstable

2003-06-25 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 21:28, Bill Morgan wrote: > A few days ago, Colin Watson referred to > > "...perlmagick, which is still at a perl 5.6 > version in testing. This was temporarily necessary because getting perl > 5.8 was more important than waiting for all of perlmagick's > dependencies, which

Re: Going Unstable

2003-06-24 Thread Marino Fernandez
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 04:28 am, Bill Morgan wrote: > Is this a good time to move to unstable, or is there breakage right now? > > Should I watch the mailing lists for 12-18 hours after the mirrors update > to see if there are problems? (And what time is that, again?) > > Or am I just being pa

Going Unstable

2003-06-24 Thread Bill Morgan
A few days ago, Colin Watson referred to "...perlmagick, which is still at a perl 5.6 version in testing. This was temporarily necessary because getting perl 5.8 was more important than waiting for all of perlmagick's dependencies, which remain very messy and complicated; my notes say that imagema