[cut]
>
> I'd be very interested in seeing a case where kompare displays a valid patch
> incorrectly.
> --
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
FYI,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256355
Regards,
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Gregory Seidman
wrote:
[cut]
>
> Also, of course you need an original file. If you don't have an original
> file there is nothing to look at other than the patch file itself. What
> is there to visualize without an original?
>
>> Regards,
>> Robert
> --Greg
>
The sa
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:30:13AM +0100, Rob Gom wrote:
> [cut]
> >
> > You have to be comfortable in vim, but you can use the following:
> >
> > gvim "+vert diffpatch "
> >
> > If you aren't comfortable with vim, you *might* be able to use the
> > following, but no guarantees (I don't have a pat
[cut]
>
> You have to be comfortable in vim, but you can use the following:
>
> gvim "+vert diffpatch "
>
> If you aren't comfortable with vim, you *might* be able to use the
> following, but no guarantees (I don't have a patch file handy to determine
> whether this will work):
>
> gvim -y "+vert
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Rob Gom:
>>
>> do you know/is there any graphical patch/diff viewer in Debian (or for
>> Linux in general)? Such a tool would produce side by side view of
>> changes/deletions/inserts.
>
> Apart from vimdiff: have you tried Kdiff3?
>
[cut]
Can
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> In , Rob Gom
> wrote:
>>There is kompare for KDE, but it is unreliable - produces false
>>results for specific patches.
>
> Odd. I use it all the time and haven't seen it be inconsistent. It fails
> indicate files have changed when
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
[cut]
> Apply the patch in a tmp directory and then use meld, vimdiff, or what you
> like
>
Why should I do such operation? Only to satisfy some tools? I don't
need/want to apply huge patches to huge source trees. I want to
preview them sepa
In , Rob Gom
wrote:
>There is kompare for KDE, but it is unreliable - produces false
>results for specific patches.
Odd. I use it all the time and haven't seen it be inconsistent. It fails
indicate files have changed when git uses "Binary files a and b differ." as
the patch text, but it shows
Rob Gom:
>
> do you know/is there any graphical patch/diff viewer in Debian (or for
> Linux in general)? Such a tool would produce side by side view of
> changes/deletions/inserts.
Apart from vimdiff: have you tried Kdiff3?
J.
--
I can tell a Whopper[tm] from a BigMac[tm] and Coke[tm] from Pepsi
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:08:13AM +0100, Rob Gom wrote:
> Hi all,
> do you know/is there any graphical patch/diff viewer in Debian (or for
> Linux in general)? Such a tool would produce side by side view of
> changes/deletions/inserts.
> There is kompare for KDE, but it is unreliable - produces fa
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Rob Gom wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Rob Gom writes:
>>> do you know/is there any graphical patch/diff viewer in Debian (or for
>>> Linux in general)? Such a tool would produce side by side view of
>>> c
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Rob Gom writes:
>> do you know/is there any graphical patch/diff viewer in Debian (or for
>> Linux in general)? Such a tool would produce side by side view of
>> changes/deletions/inserts.
>> There is kompare for KDE, but
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Rob Gom writes:
> do you know/is there any graphical patch/diff viewer in Debian (or for
> Linux in general)? Such a tool would produce side by side view of
> changes/deletions/inserts.
> There is kompare for KDE, but it is unreliable - produces false
> results for specific pat
Hi all,
do you know/is there any graphical patch/diff viewer in Debian (or for
Linux in general)? Such a tool would produce side by side view of
changes/deletions/inserts.
There is kompare for KDE, but it is unreliable - produces false
results for specific patches (bug not reported yet, as I have t
14 matches
Mail list logo
