Re: HTML syntax.

to 100, >> not sure all of them still exist (or ever existed "in the wild"). > > Thanks. I installed Geany and it colors HTML syntax. Definitely helpful. > > Mousepad has View > Color Scheme > {None, Classic, Cobalt, ... }. > None is the only color s

Re: HTML syntax.

ever existed "in the wild"). Thanks. I installed Geany and it colors HTML syntax. Definitely helpful. Mousepad has View > Color Scheme > {None, Classic, Cobalt, ... }. None is the only color scheme it will retain. Does mousepad need another module for color sc

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I agree that it is not people-friendly to try preventing the use of a > video after it was depublicated by state TV. The concept of Depublication > is technically an unrealistic fiction and also a blow to the payers of > state TV fees ("Rundfunkgebuehren"). > > Given the

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

On Wed, 05 May 2021 09:51:59 +0200 "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: > > But i really do not see any such censoring with the video about > environmental problems with electrical cars. It was aired and then > available for two months. Business as good or bad as ever. > Even the WEF are fairly upfront

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Hi, i wrote: > > the song "Meine Oma ist 'ne alte Umweltsau" (= "My granny is an old > > environmental hog"), sung by a children choir Michael Lange wrote: > Still seems to be available on yt, though. Legally it could now be "Zeitgeschichte" (= "contemporary history") and thus be exempted from

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Hi, i wrote: > > i really do not see any such censoring with the video about > > environmental problems with electrical cars. deloptes wrote: > But it was on youtube and was removed and I could not find it I agree that it is not people-friendly to try preventing the use of a video after it was

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Hi, On Wed, 05 May 2021 09:51:59 +0200 "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: (...) > The reason for not eternally offering videos for download is in the > legal framework of german state TV. (In german: > "Rundfunkstaatsvertrag", now "Medienstaatsvertrag".) > > State run TV collects mandatory fees from all

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > We had cases of self-censoring which led to depublication. I remember > the song "Meine Oma ist 'ne alte Umweltsau" (= "My granny is an old > environmental hog"), sung by a children choir and produced by TV station > WDR in 2019. That video was retracted after conservative

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Hi, Michael Lange wrote: > Oddly, it seems like the German public TV station ZDF blocked the video > for Germany due to "intellectual property rights" which are not explained > any further. The reason for not eternally offering videos for download is in the legal framework of german state TV.

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Hi, On Wed, 05 May 2021 09:16:55 +0200 deloptes wrote: > Michael Lange wrote: > > > now I got curious too. > > Oddly, it seems like the German public TV station ZDF blocked the > > video for Germany due to "intellectual property rights" which are not > > explained any further. Maybe the real

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Michael Lange wrote: > now I got curious too. > Oddly, it seems like the German public TV station ZDF blocked the video > for Germany due to "intellectual property rights" which are not explained > any further. Maybe the real copyright holders still hope to earn money by > somehow selling their

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Felmon Davis wrote: > I got intrigued (and again apologies for my error!) and weird but I > found it here: . > > I'm pretty sure it's the right video but check. > > also I wonder if the link will work for you. Cool. This is great help - THANK YOU!

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Hi, On Wed, 5 May 2021 01:06:30 +0200 (CEST) Felmon Davis wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2021, deloptes wrote: > > > Felmon Davis wrote: > > > >> you can view it on youtube (if that's compliant with your principles) > >> at > > > > this is exactly the

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

On Tue, 4 May 2021, deloptes wrote: Felmon Davis wrote: you can view it on youtube (if that's compliant with your principles) at this is exactly the problem - the original video is not there, but the one where someone comments on the video is

Re: HTML syntax.

On Monday, May 03, 2021 11:44:41 AM pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are > paired and nested properly. An opening tag without matching close, a > closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged > by line number or

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

On Tue, 4 May 2021, deloptes wrote: Felmon Davis wrote: you can view it on youtube (if that's compliant with your principles) at this is exactly the problem - the original video is not there, but the one where someone comments on the video is

Re: HTML syntax.

Weaver wrote: > Maybe they just moved it? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyumbvFdDNo > Cheers! No the original one was 1.5h - full documentary

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Felmon Davis wrote: > you can view it on youtube (if that's compliant with your principles) > at this is exactly the problem - the original video is not there, but the one where someone comments on the video is there

Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

On Tue, 4 May 2021, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, deloptes wrote: I just tried to find a video on ARTE You believe french-german state TV ? I watched some time ago. Video was called "Umweltsünder E-Auto?" For the non-germans: = "Environmental Sinner E-Car ?". (It was a bit exaggerated as

[Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

Hi, deloptes wrote: > I just tried to find a video on ARTE You believe french-german state TV ? > I watched some time ago. Video was called "Umweltsünder E-Auto?" For the non-germans: = "Environmental Sinner E-Car ?". (It was a bit exaggerated as in several other documentaries of ARTE, but

Re: HTML syntax.

On 04-05-2021 18:34, deloptes wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 11:54:58PM +0200, deloptes wrote: >>> to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >>> >>> > xmllint has an --html option for that. That said... >>> >>> you sure that it will give a warning if tag is not closed? Cause I do not

Re: HTML syntax.

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 11:54:58PM +0200, deloptes wrote: >> to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >> >> > xmllint has an --html option for that. That said... >> >> you sure that it will give a warning if tag is not closed? Cause I do not >> think so. In fact the --html option seems

Re: HTML syntax.

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 11:54:58PM +0200, deloptes wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > xmllint has an --html option for that. That said... > > you sure that it will give a warning if tag is not closed? Cause I do not > think so. In fact the --html option seems to correct those missing tags. >

Re: HTML syntax.

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > xmllint has an --html option for that. That said... you sure that it will give a warning if tag is not closed? Cause I do not think so. In fact the --html option seems to correct those missing tags. All together it's a good tool, but I do not know how it applies to

Re: HTML syntax.

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:50:52PM +0200, deloptes wrote: [...] > HTML is not strict XML - so it depends on the definition of the page (my > knowledge is based on HTML2-4, but should apply to recent 5) > So it means that you can omit closing tag (check w3c.org) > > Regarding checking XML -

Re: HTML syntax.

pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi again, > > Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are > paired and nested properly.  An opening tag without matching close, a > closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged > by line number or color. > >

Re: HTML syntax.

On 2021-05-03 16:44, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: Hi again, Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are paired and nested properly. An opening tag without matching close, a closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged by line number or color.

Re: HTML syntax.

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:26:54PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are > > paired and nested properly. An opening tag without matching close, a > > closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged > > by

Re: HTML syntax.

peter composed on 2021-05-03 08:44 (UTC-0700): > Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are > paired and nested properly. An opening tag without matching close, a > closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged > by line number or color. >

Re: HTML syntax.

> Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are > paired and nested properly. An opening tag without matching close, a > closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged > by line number or color. Since Emacs's built-in `nxml-mode` does that, and

Re: HTML syntax.

pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi again, > > Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are > paired and nested properly. An opening tag without matching close, a > closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged > by line number or color. > >

HTML syntax.

Hi again, Is there an editor which checks that HTML opening and closing tags are paired and nested properly. An opening tag without matching close, a closing tag without matching open and crossed tags should be flagged by line number or color. Preferably an editor with minimal overhead of