also sprach Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.24.1654 +0200]:
> SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
>
> Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
> sdb be half that size at 898
Kevin Coyner said:
>
> SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
>
> Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
> sdb be half that size at 8984MB each? Or is it typical of Raid0 to
> report
>> Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
>> sdb be half that size at 8984MB each? Or is it typical of Raid0 to
>> report the combined size of the two drives it uses for striping?
Speaking of hardware RAID, I've set up a RAID-1 (mirroring) array on my
server. Eve
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:02:41AM -0700, nate wrote..
> Kevin Coyner said:
>
> > SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> > SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> >
> > Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
> > sdb
I'm trying to setup a Raid0 using a SCSI LSI Raid controller card and
four 9G SCSI drives. The intent is to have two drives (sda and sdb),
both of which use Raid0. During POST I can get into the controller bios
and set it up for Raid0. I then continue on with the normal boot
process, which yie
5 matches
Mail list logo