On Mi, 10 apr 19, 15:40:13, Pierre Fourès wrote:
>
> I did the test and all went as expected. I got ecryptfs-utils being
> installed with the four of its dependencies. One of them, keyutils, is
> in 1.5.9-9 in stretch and 1.6.6 in buster. As expected, apt installed
> the one from buster. After the
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:56:04 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
...
> If I remember encfs correctly, encfs is designed to provide exclusive
> access to the user who mounts an encrypted folder -- no other user,
> including root, can see the plaintext.
My understanding is that while this is technic
On 4/11/19 6:51 AM, Pierre Fourès wrote:
Le jeu. 11 avr. 2019 à 02:52, David Christensen
a écrit :
How about enfs, gocryptfs, and/or libpam-mount?
2019-04-10 17:48:09 dpchrist@po ~
$ apt-cache search fuse encrypt
afflib-tools - Advanced Forensics Format Library (utilities)
camo - SSL/TLS image
Le jeu. 11 avr. 2019 à 02:52, David Christensen
a écrit :
>
> On 4/10/19 1:32 AM, Pierre Fourès wrote:
> > Le ven. 5 avr. 2019 à 22:08, David Christensen
> > a écrit :
> >>
> >> AFAIK dm-crypt is the canonical disc encryption technology on Linux (see
> >> crypttab(5) and cryptsetup(8)). I like t
On 4/10/19 1:32 AM, Pierre Fourès wrote:
Le ven. 5 avr. 2019 à 22:08, David Christensen
a écrit :
AFAIK dm-crypt is the canonical disc encryption technology on Linux (see
crypttab(5) and cryptsetup(8)). I like the fact that it operates at the
device level, so everything on an encrypted disc o
Le ven. 5 avr. 2019 à 17:07, Pierre Fourès a écrit :
> I would like a « simple and easy » solution.
In the hope it may help someone or at least give some food for
thoughts, here is what I eventually did to fix my issue.
I use apt-cacher-ng. I first thought to log in the instance and grab
the pac
Le ven. 5 avr. 2019 à 22:08, David Christensen
a écrit :
>
> AFAIK dm-crypt is the canonical disc encryption technology on Linux (see
> crypttab(5) and cryptsetup(8)). I like the fact that it operates at the
> device level, so everything on an encrypted disc or partition is
> automatically and in
On 4/5/19 8:07 AM, Pierre Fourès wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of rebuilding new virtual instances for the Desktop
user's of my company. We provides these instance in order to be able
to run the validated software stack on non-validated software stacks
(ie. running a virtual box inside a custom
Hi,
I'm in the process of rebuilding new virtual instances for the Desktop
user's of my company. We provides these instance in order to be able
to run the validated software stack on non-validated software stacks
(ie. running a virtual box inside a custom installed Linux, or on OSX
or Windows). Th
9 matches
Mail list logo
