On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> If I remember my timeline of events correctly, this is because there was
> no ffmpeg package in jessie; the libav fork was present in its place. (I
> thought libav had still been providing a ffmpeg dummy package, but I may
> be remembering wr
On 2015-12-19 at 11:38, Kynn Jones wrote:
> An additional detail I noticed after I posted the message above:
>
> % apt-cache policy ffmpeg
> ffmpeg:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 7:2.8.3-1
> Version table:
> 7:2.8.3-1 0
> 500 http://http.us.debian
Kynn Jones a écrit :
>
> I don't understand why the ffmpeg version from stretch comes out as
> the best (and only remaining) candidate.
>
> How can I find out why the ffmpeg version from jessie (whatever that
> is) is not a candidate?
It appears that there is no ffmpeg package in Jessie.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Kynn Jones wrote:
> I apologize for all these apt-related questions.
>
> I have rtfm'd on this ad nauseam. For years, literally.
>
> Still, I'm routinely rendered utterly helpless by this sort of thing:
>
> % sudo apt-get -qq update
> % sudo apt-get -qq u
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> Assuming you don't actually have any package holds (check 'apt-mark
> showhold' to verify that), and since you've already confirmed that you
> don't have any seemingly-applicable pins:
>
> Append one or more of the listed packages to the 'apt
On 2015-12-19 at 10:24, Kynn Jones wrote:
> I apologize for all these apt-related questions.
>
> I have rtfm'd on this ad nauseam. For years, literally.
>
> Still, I'm routinely rendered utterly helpless by this sort of thing:
>
> % sudo apt-get -qq update
> % sudo apt-get -qq upgrade
I apologize for all these apt-related questions.
I have rtfm'd on this ad nauseam. For years, literally.
Still, I'm routinely rendered utterly helpless by this sort of thing:
% sudo apt-get -qq update
% sudo apt-get -qq upgrade
% sudo apt-get -qq dist-upgrade
% sudo apt-get inst
7 matches
Mail list logo
