On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:00:55 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andy Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:14:41PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> Nate Bargmann wrote:
> [snip]
> > This is a bit simplistic. Hyper-Threading (or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:14:41PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Nate Bargmann wrote:
[snip]
> This is a bit simplistic. Hyper-Threading (or more correctly,
> simultaneous multithreading (SMT)) is almost always a win because
> at
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:14:41PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > I have been considering an HT based machine and would like to
> > learn of any potential pitfalls.
>
> The h/w emulates 2 CPUs. Thus, even more than a single CPU
> switching contexts, the HT-enabled CPU adds t
3 matches
Mail list logo