Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-02 Thread Preston Boyington
Nuno Magalhães wrote: snipped Can i have a regular desktop Debian without an MTA? yes. install 'nullmailer' via aptitude. i use it on my laptops. (haven't read all the posts yet, so someone might have already suggested this) Preston -- Arrant Drivel - really, it's just trash...

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-02 Thread Aneurin Price
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: On 01/31/2009 07:28 PM, Aneurin Price wrote: ... I'm curious however what it is you have installed that depends on exim, or the mail-transport-agent virtual package. I have no MTA installed on my machine, and no

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Jerry Stuckle
Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/31/2009 09:24 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: [snip] main concern. I guess having an MTA is a side-effect of the whole client/server thing; prejucide or not it's an opinion. That's Windows-think to say whether a *computer* s a client or server. Such a mindset needs to be

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Martin Kraus
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 08:34:46AM -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/31/2009 09:24 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: [snip] main concern. I guess having an MTA is a side-effect of the whole client/server thing; prejucide or not it's an opinion. That's Windows-think to say whether

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Nuno Magalhães
I don't consider myself windows-centric. I've been using Debian at home since Woody and even though i'm not afraid of the command prompt i don't consider myself a power-user either (i'll get there). The point being yes, i know what clients and servers are and agree with Martin Kraus' definition,

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Jochen Schulz
Nuno Magalhães: Would you mind posting the output of 'aptitude why mail-transfer-agent' or 'aptitude why exim', whichever is more enlightening? $ aptitude why mail-transport-agent i lsb Depends lsb-core i A lsb-core Depends exim4 | mail-transport-agent Thanks a lot for showing this

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: No. Lsb is an extra package that you almost certainly don't need unless you are running LSB-compliant closed-source software. LSB stands for Linux Standard Base. Google it. Tzafrir Cohen writes: 'aptitude rdepends lsb-base' gives results such as avahi-daemon, apache2.2-common,

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:58:01PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote: Greetings. I use webmail, i'm not running a mail server. At most i'd use an MUA to comunicate with whichever mail services i use. However, i must have exim4 installed. How can i work around this? Regardless of how much

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread pierpaolo
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.ptwrote: The way i see it, most regular users either use webmail, or an MUA to conenct to webmail accounts. Technicaly speaking, i think there should be a way to configure mail-dependant programs to either use an MTA or use

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:21:24PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote: ... Back to exim, if i have X i have x11-common (and i also have avahi) therefore i apaprently must have lsb, which i believe is a metapackage for lsb-* (i have base, core, cxx, etc installed). So apaprently i can't just

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Jerry Stuckle
Martin Kraus wrote: On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 08:34:46AM -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/31/2009 09:24 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: [snip] main concern. I guess having an MTA is a side-effect of the whole client/server thing; prejucide or not it's an opinion. That's

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/01/2009 12:49 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: [snip] I never said server machines can't run client applications. But the term server has always referred to machines who's main purpose is to provide services to other machines (clients). As I said - it has been that way for the more than 40

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Alex Samad
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:21:24PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote: [snip] For now i'll stick with Florian Kulzer's suggestion of reducing DNS, since that's the main issue for me (slow booting). if its a start up problem, and you are not really using the mta why not go update-rc.d -f exim4

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:24:57AM +, Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt was heard to say: Would you mind posting the output of 'aptitude why mail-transfer-agent' or 'aptitude why exim', whichever is more enlightening? $ aptitude why mail-transport-agent i lsb Depends

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 04:30:49PM -0800, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org was heard to say: $ aptitude search '?depends(mail-transport-agent)' Sorry, that should be $ aptitude search '?installed?depends(?name(^mail-transport-agent$))' to restrict it to installed packages and to

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-02-01 Thread Nuno Magalhães
Sorry, that should be $ aptitude search '?installed?depends(?name(^mail-transport-agent$))' to restrict it to installed packages and to make extra-sure nothing else sneaks in. Before i saw your second post i ran: $ aptitude search '?depends(mail-transport-agent)' |grep ^i i A at

I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Nuno Magalhães
Greetings. I use webmail, i'm not running a mail server. At most i'd use an MUA to comunicate with whichever mail services i use. However, i must have exim4 installed. How can i work around this? Regardless of how much resources it requires i find it irritating. The real nudge is having Starting

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Steve Kemp
On Sat Jan 31, 2009 at 21:58:01 +, Nuno Magalh??es wrote: How can i work around this? Regardless of how much resources it requires i find it irritating. The real nudge is having Starting MTA: lagging by boot by half a minute or so. You need one, as far as the system is concerned, to

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On 01/31/2009 03:58 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: Greetings. I use webmail, i'm not running a mail server. At most i'd use an MUA to comunicate with whichever mail services i use. However, i must have exim4 installed. How can i work around this? Regardless of how much resources it requires i find

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/31/2009 03:58 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: Can i have a regular desktop Debian without an MTA? Linux? No. Please, don't overestimate :) Base system is also Linux, though it doesn't contain any MTA for the obvious reasons. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID:

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 16:12:24 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/31/2009 03:58 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: Greetings. I use webmail, i'm not running a mail server. At most i'd use an MUA to comunicate with whichever mail services i use. However, i must have exim4 installed. How can i work

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt [2009 Jan 31 16:00 -0600]: Can i have a regular desktop Debian without an MTA? Difficult, but try the esmtp package. It is very light weight and only runs when actually needed. - Nate -- The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Nuno Magalhães
Thanks for the suggestions. For now i'll try restraining DNS. Whenever the loss of mouse pointer forces me to reboot again i'll see it it works :) If not, either getting it out of the init scripts o switching to another MTA. I like the client/server approach but this MTA stuff is kind of

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Aneurin Price
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt wrote: Thanks for the suggestions. For now i'll try restraining DNS. Whenever the loss of mouse pointer forces me to reboot again i'll see it it works :) If not, either getting it out of the init scripts o switching to

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On 01/31/2009 07:28 PM, Aneurin Price wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt wrote: Thanks for the suggestions. For now i'll try restraining DNS. Whenever the loss of mouse pointer forces me to reboot again i'll see it it works :) If not, either getting

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Martin
2009/2/1 Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt: I like the client/server approach but this MTA stuff is kind of annoying for regular desktop use. Is there a bogus MTA? One that'll pretend to be one and accept stuff from its clients but basically /dev/null everything? I like nullmailer,

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread John Hasler
Nye writes: I'm curious however what it is you have installed that depends on exim, or the mail-transport-agent virtual package. bsd-mailx is standard and depends on mail-transport-agent. You can, of course, remove bsd-mailx though this anti-MTA prejudice baffles me. -- John Hasler -- To

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Nuno Magalhães
Would you mind posting the output of 'aptitude why mail-transfer-agent' or 'aptitude why exim', whichever is more enlightening? $ aptitude why mail-transport-agent i lsb Depends lsb-core i A lsb-core Depends exim4 | mail-transport-agent Same results if i why on exim4. I assume lsb

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread John Hasler
Nuno writes: I assume lsb includes cron and other base-level tools that require mail functionality. No. Lsb is an extra package that you almost certainly don't need unless you are running LSB-compliant closed-source software. LSB stands for Linux Standard Base. Google it. Is this all that

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On 01/31/2009 09:24 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: [snip] main concern. I guess having an MTA is a side-effect of the whole client/server thing; prejucide or not it's an opinion. That's Windows-think to say whether a *computer* s a client or server. Such a mindset needs to be banished to get full

Re: I don't need an MTA

2009-01-31 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:55:50PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: Nuno writes: I assume lsb includes cron and other base-level tools that require mail functionality. No. Lsb is an extra package that you almost certainly don't need unless you are running LSB-compliant closed-source software.