Per Lundberg per...@gmail.com writes:
Hi there!
Isn't there any XDMCP-capable server available in squeeze that can
speak ipv4 any more?
I read about the net.ipv6.bindv6only issue (in a bug report).
However, that setting is most assuredly set to 0 when I check with
sysctl -a.
I also
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org wrote:
Hi Carl, and thanks for your reply!
(I'll include my full original email, since I extended the audience to
the debian-devel list as well)
Per Lundberg per...@gmail.com writes:
Isn't there any XDMCP-capable server available
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 22:32:07 +0300, Per Lundberg wrote:
Isn't there any XDMCP-capable server available in squeeze that can
speak ipv4 any more?
I'm fairly sure xdmcp over ipv4 works just fine with both xdm and gdm in
squeeze, because I tested them (and made them work with the
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:16:06 +0300, Per Lundberg wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Julien,
I'm fairly sure xdmcp over ipv4 works just fine with both xdm and gdm in
squeeze, because I tested them (and made them work with the
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Julien,
I'm fairly sure xdmcp over ipv4 works just fine with both xdm and gdm in
squeeze, because I tested them (and made them work with the bindv6only=1
setting) a month or two ago.
OK, that's interesting... Just
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:16:06 +0300, Per Lundberg wrote:
p...@terah:/etc/sysctl.d$ sudo netstat -l -n -p | grep 177
udp6 0 0 :::177 :::*
1632/xdm
That's fine, bind() on
Hi there!
Isn't there any XDMCP-capable server available in squeeze that can
speak ipv4 any more?
I read about the net.ipv6.bindv6only issue (in a bug report).
However, that setting is most assuredly set to 0 when I check with
sysctl -a.
I also forcibly disabled IPv6 support altogether (since I
7 matches
Mail list logo
