ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-09 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, This is slightly offtopic, but I didn't got a relevant answer in other places, so I thought lets ask my debian friends ;) I had my apache listening on port 445 for https connections, this worked perfectly for a long time. Today I got a message from a user stating that he couldn't get a con

RE: ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-11 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
| Cox Cable did the same thing with port 80 soon after Code Red | struck. Yet another reason why I hate MSFT and lusers. | | At the same time, they decided to be really anal and block port | 25, too. Bah! | >From the COX support pages FAQ Question: What ports do you block? Answer: We blo

Re: ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-09 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is slightly offtopic, but I didn't got a relevant answer in other > places, so I thought lets ask my debian friends ;) > > I had my apache listening on port 445 for https connections, this > worked perfect

Re: ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > I know it's rather silly to reply on your on post, but I did some more > research... It seems that our M$ using friends have some problems. > Win2k/XP have a filesharing protocol on 445, and because most users of > M$ products are so

Re: ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200 > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is slightly offtopic, but I didn't got a relevant answer in other > > places, so I thought lets ask my debian friends ;) > > > > I had my apache

Re: ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-10 Thread Gerald Livingston
On 10 Oct 2002 11:24:36 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200 > > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I know it's rather silly to reply on your on post, but I did some > > more research...

Re: ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-10 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:35:36PM -0500, Gerald Livingston wrote: > Time Warner blocked 80 here but they are polite enough to scan 25 for > open relays. From the rejected messages in Exim it appears that if they > find one they will at least inform you before locking it down. (Messages > deleted

Re: ISPs are blocking port 445?

2002-10-10 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Gerald Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 10 October 2002, 04:35 PM -0500): > On 10 Oct 2002 11:24:36 -0500 > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:42 +0200 > > > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ISPs are blocking port 445? - att

2002-10-10 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya attbi is trying to prevent users from running servers at home ( think its a hopeless problem but they can keep trying i say, sooner or later, tv signals from lot more tv viewers will pay the price since they all share the same cable... ( another il-concieved idea?? - good enough for now