On 06/02/2014 13:12, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
(you could use grep -e '^ii') or egrep '^ii', but I think it's not
worth the cpu used).
You don't need -e to use anchors in the regex. Whilst -e would use more
CPU than a plain grep, the anchor would likely reduce the work done
(lines can be matched
On 06/02/2014 13:06, Tino Sino wrote:
I wonder, what's the golden way to do this and why?
It depends on what you're doing it for. If it's for a script, dpkg-query
is a better choice, because you can do --showformat
and it does not truncate version strings etc. 'dpkg -l' output
is really meant
Op 2013-09-08 om 10:38 schreef Geert Stappers:
Op 2013-09-08 om 10:27 schreef Geert Stappers:
Hoi,
Aptitude laat bij installatie zien welke packages als dependency
automatisch naar binnen gehaald worden.
De indicator is '{a}'. Voorbeeld:
screenshot
# aptitude install
On 08/09/13 10:58, Geert Stappers wrote:
Ik gebruik nu deze (smerige?) truuk: `aptitude search .`
Als er iets beter is dan zoeken op een package waar een punt
in de beschrijving staat, dan hou ik mij aanbevolen.
En eigenlijk ging het niet om automatisch ge-installeerd packages,
maar hoe
On Mi, 24 apr 13, 08:43:07, green wrote:
Following are the commands I use for backup and restore of the package
selection. Please note that I have not needed to use these commands
for some time. In fact, aptitude-create-state-bundle arrived some
time after I implemented this; I have not
On 04/23/2013 09:12 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed packages except those
automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as
i but not as i A. And if there is no command to list
On 24 Apr 2013, Lars Nooden wrote:
On 04/23/2013 09:12 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i
Mark Weyer wrote at 2013-04-23 16:12 -0500:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as i but
not as i A. And if there is no command to list
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:12:44PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i A. And if there
is no command to list this, where in /etc (or whereever
On 4/23/2013 17:12, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i A. And if
there is no command to list
Hi Mark,
the following should work, listing only the manually installed packages.
aptitude search '?installed?not(?automatic)' -F %p | sed 's/ //g'
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Mark Weyer m...@weyer-zuhause.de wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
On 4/23/2013 17:11, staticsafe wrote:
On 4/23/2013 17:12, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:12:44 +0200
Mark Weyer m...@weyer-zuhause.de wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
dependencies.
snip
aptitude search '~i!~M'
--
EMACS is my operating system
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:12:44PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as i but
not as i
Is there any way to tell apt to hold a particular package in a non-installed
state?
Having previously encountered problems due to having tried to dist-upgrade
across a long gap, I perform a dist-upgrade to testing on the order of weekly.
When apt-listbugs reports a bug which is important enough
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 13:57:17, The Wanderer wrote:
Is there any way to tell apt to hold a particular package in a non-installed
state?
Several, but the easiest would be to pin it to a priority smaller than
0, see apt_preferences(5) for more info. However for your case it might
be easier to find
On 09/03/2012 02:36 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 13:57:17, The Wanderer wrote:
Is there any way to tell apt to hold a particular package in a
non-installed state?
Several, but the easiest would be to pin it to a priority smaller than 0, see
apt_preferences(5) for more info.
On Mi, 20 iun 12, 20:55:09, Artifex Maximus wrote:
I think the continuous upgrade process from the early stage of Wheezy
left some unneeded packages. This is normal as I started early just
want to clean out my system. Maybe I am wrong on base idea but would
like to check and look for some
Hello!
My Wheezy was installed on a very early stage any I would like to
compare packages against a fresh installation to see what is different
or changed. Probably nothing but would like to verify. Therefore I
would like to make a dependency tree (graph) on installed packages
under Wheezy
apt-cache dump | grep Package:
apt-cache dump | grep Version:
Those will get 2 separate lists of installed software names versions.
Maybe that will get what you want in a roundabout way. :-)
--
Sent from FOSS (Free Open Source Software)
Debian GNU/Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Keith McKenzie km3...@gmail.com wrote:
apt-cache dump | grep Package:
apt-cache dump | grep Version:
Those will get 2 separate lists of installed software names versions.
Maybe that will get what you want in a roundabout way. :-)
Thank you. Unfortunately
to make a dependency tree (graph) on installed packages
under Wheezy for both (my older and a fresh) installation. On the two
dependency trees I am able to find differences between them because
packages by packages compare is not enough I think.
I have made some google and found that debtree
Artifex Maximus [2012-06-20 12:08:39 +0200] wrote:
debtree needs a package name for graph but I need all my installed
packages (no --all or asterisk parameter) not just some and apt-cache
makes tree from all packages Debian has even I specify the parameter
--installed. I am stuck.
I may have
Hello Artifex,
Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Keith McKenzie km3...@gmail.com wrote:
Those will get 2 separate lists of installed software names versions.
# dpkg --list | wc -l
2481
Why don’t you use the output of dpkg -l? Also check man 1
or changed. Probably nothing but would like to verify. Therefore I
would like to make a dependency tree (graph) on installed packages
under Wheezy for both (my older and a fresh) installation. On the two
dependency trees I am able to find differences between them because
packages by packages compare
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Teemu Likonen tliko...@iki.fi wrote:
Artifex Maximus [2012-06-20 12:08:39 +0200] wrote:
debtree needs a package name for graph but I need all my installed
packages (no --all or asterisk parameter) not just some and apt-cache
makes tree from all packages Debian
.
# dpkg --list | wc -l
2481
Why don’t you use the output of dpkg -l? Also check man 1 dpkg-query.
Thank you. dpkg -l writes out all installed packages but not the
relations between them. I did similar comparison between systems but
seeing the differences in a tree makes this process easier because I
Hello Artifex,
Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. dpkg -l writes out all installed packages but not the
relations between them. I did similar comparison between systems but
seeing the differences in a tree makes this process easier because I
can cut leafs if I know
Please post the full output of 'apt-get dist-upgrade' here, otherwise we
can only guess.
I waited a few days and did an apt-get update and dist-upgrade and the
manually installed packages that were previously a problem were no longer
going to be removed. So the problem is solved but I do
to manual but it keeps wanting
to remove it during dist-upgrade.
How can I prevent apt from removing my manually installed packages?
Please post the full output of 'apt-get dist-upgrade' here, otherwise we
can only guess.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users
James Robertson j...@mesrobertson.com wrote:
JR I am running Sid.
JR while doing a dist-upgrade apt-get wants to remove a number of packages that
JR are manually installed.
JR How can I prevent apt from removing my manually installed packages?
i've made apt-get ignore packages
-upgrade.
How can I prevent apt from removing my manually installed packages?
it in and read it as a data drive.
So where on that drive can I find the list of installed packages?
Thank you!
Hal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
on that drive can I find the list of installed packages?
/var/lib/dpkg/status should contain information on the installed
packages, if the file is present.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
can I find the list of installed packages?
You could also mount that PATA drive externally and chroot into it to
request that (or any other) info:
# dpkg -l list.of.packages.txt
The result is a much smaller file:
# dpkg -l list
# ll list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 297969 ene 8 18:39 list
# ll
it in and read it as a data drive.
So where on that drive can I find the list of installed packages?
You could also mount that PATA drive externally and chroot into it to
request that (or any other) info:
# dpkg -l list.of.packages.txt
The result is a much smaller file:
# dpkg -l list
David Sastre wrote:
You could also mount that PATA drive externally and chroot into it to
request that (or any other) info:
You can also use dpkg's --admindir option so:
dpkg --admindir=/mnt/backup/var/lib/apt --get-selections
packagelist.txt
I'd imagine you could just pipe that into
on the old
PATA drive. I can, though, plug it in and read it as a data drive.
So where on that drive can I find the list of installed packages?
You could also mount that PATA drive externally and chroot into it to
request that (or any other) info:
# dpkg -l list.of.packages.txt
re-install Debian with no trouble, the only issue is that I
don't have the up-to-date list of all the packages installed on the old PATA
drive. I can, though, plug it in and read it as a data drive.
So where on that drive can I find the list of installed packages?
Thank you!
Hal
On Sb, 08 ian 11, 18:38:45, Avi Greenbury wrote:
David Sastre wrote:
You could also mount that PATA drive externally and chroot into it to
request that (or any other) info:
You can also use dpkg's --admindir option so:
dpkg --admindir=/mnt/backup/var/lib/apt --get-selections
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com wrote:
Thank you, everyone, for the answers. This will make restoring this go
faster.
You can also use aptitude search -F '%p' '?installed' or aptitude
search -F '%p' '?installed' pkgs-installed and aptitude -F '%p'
search
Hal Vaughan wrote:
Without doing a chroot (while I know the mobo on the old system
crashed, I'm beginning to suspect drive/OS issues), I could use a
few utils like grep and awk to change a list from
/var/lib/dpkg/status if I needed to, couldn't I?
Try this:
grep-dctrl -FStatus -sPackage -n
$ aptitude -F %?p --disable-columns search \~i\!\~W
E: Can't search for
On both Lenny and Kubuntu 10.10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Chance Platt wrote:
deborphan --all-packages
Thanks that definitely answer my need, especially called this way:
deborphan --all-packages | sort
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
aptitude search '~i!~M'
aptitude search '?installed?not(?automatic)'
I guess this lists the one not automatically installed, but that's something
quite different
With dpkg such a list can be generated with
for x in $(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f1)
do
[ -z $(grep -E Depends.* $x(
Loris Boillet wrote at 2010-10-13 12:16 -0600:
$ aptitude -F %?p --disable-columns search \~i\!\~W
E: Can't search for
Oops. Try M instead of W.
This is shorthand for ?installed!?automatic as in another post.
$ aptitude -F %?p --disable-columns search \~i\!\~M
signature.asc
Description:
With dpkg such a list can be generated with
for x in $(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f1)
do
[ -z $(grep -E Depends.* $x( |,|$) /var/lib/dpkg/status) ]
echo $x
done
--
Best regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed
packages which are not the dependency of something? Or in other words,
packages which don't have any reverse dependencies installed. It looks
like debtree can't do it for instance.
Debian systems typically having hundreds
Loris Boillet wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed
packages which are not the dependency of something? Or in other words,
packages which don't have any reverse dependencies installed. It looks
like debtree can't do it for instance.
deborphan --all-packages
Chance Platt wrote:
Loris Boillet wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed
packages which are not the dependency of something? Or in other words,
packages which don't have any reverse dependencies installed. It looks
like debtree can't do it for instance
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:21:58 +0200, Loris Boillet wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed packages
which are not the dependency of something?
Mmmm, I've still not found a package that does not depend on another
package (there are always basic library
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Chance Platt wrote:
Loris Boillet wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed
packages which are not the dependency of something? Or in other words,
packages which don't have any reverse dependencies installed. It looks
like debtree can't do
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Chance Platt wrote:
Loris Boillet wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed
packages which are not the dependency of something? Or in other
words, packages which don't have any reverse dependencies installed.
deborphan --all
Loris Boillet wrote at 2010-10-11 14:21 -0600:
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed
packages which are not the dependency of something? Or in other words,
packages which don't have any reverse dependencies installed. It looks
like debtree can't do it for instance
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:21 +0200, Loris Boillet wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the list or a view of all installed
packages which are not the dependency of something? Or in other words,
aptitude search '~i!~M'
aptitude search '?installed?not(?automatic)'
http://algebraicthunk.net
Good day.
Is there an easy way how I can found out from which repo and which
section (or whatever it is called, I mean here: main, contrib,
non-free) one or more packages come from?
For example, I want to know if I have the packages installed from, say
Testing / contrib - how I can do this?
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:21:57PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
Is there an easy way how I can found out from which repo and which
section (or whatever it is called, I mean here: main, contrib,
non-free) one or more packages come from?
For example, I want to know if I have the packages installed
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:21 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
Is there an easy way how I can found out from which repo and which
section (or whatever it is called, I mean here: main, contrib,
non-free) one or more packages come from?
Certainly - Brought to me by #d's dpkg I now have the following
from, say
Testing / contrib - how I can do this?
Per package you can use 'apt-cache policy package'. If you want to
find all installed packages from contrib or non-free look at aptitude's
patterns in /usr/share/doc/aptitude/README
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users
Hi!
I want generate a list of all installed packages, without the dependencies of
manual installed packages and the the packages from the base system.
What i have found so far by our friend google:
aptitude search ?installed(?not(?automatic))
But this does not what i mean, because it also
In 20090819090118.gb7...@borusse.tmr.net, Alex Huth wrote:
I want generate a list of all installed packages, without the dependencies
of manual installed packages and the the packages from the base system.
What i have found so far by our friend google:
aptitude search ?installed(?not(?automatic
On Wed,19.Aug.09, 10:41:27, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090819090118.gb7...@borusse.tmr.net, Alex Huth wrote:
I want generate a list of all installed packages, without the dependencies
of manual installed packages and the the packages from the base system.
What i have found so far
flomine, Thu Jun 04 2009 01:43:32 GMT+0200 (CEST):
Hi list,
I am using SID and I ask myself if there is a script or something to
list all critical bugs from all installed packages. Maybe a script
using apt-listbugs which retrieves bug reports on all packages present
in /var/cache/apt/arhives
Peter Jordan a écrit :
flomine, Thu Jun 04 2009 01:43:32 GMT+0200 (CEST):
Hi list,
I am using SID and I ask myself if there is a script or something to
list all critical bugs from all installed packages. Maybe a script
using apt-listbugs which retrieves bug reports on all packages present
Peter Jordan a écrit :
flomine, Thu Jun 04 2009 01:43:32 GMT+0200 (CEST):
Hi list,
I am using SID and I ask myself if there is a script or something to
list all critical bugs from all installed packages. Maybe a script
using apt-listbugs which retrieves bug reports on all packages present
In 4a27a34f.1010...@gmail.com, flomine wrote:
Peter Jordan a écrit :
flomine, Thu Jun 04 2009 01:43:32 GMT+0200 (CEST):
Hi list,
I am using SID and I ask myself if there is a script or something to
list all critical bugs from all installed packages. Maybe a script
using apt-listbugs which
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. a écrit :
flomine wrote:
Peter Jordan a écrit :
flomine, Thu Jun 04 2009 01:43:32 GMT+0200 (CEST):
Hi list,
I am using SID and I ask myself if there is a script or something to
list all critical bugs from all installed packages. Maybe a script
Hi list,
I am using SID and I ask myself if there is a script or something to
list all critical bugs from all installed packages. Maybe a script
using apt-listbugs which retrieves bug reports on all packages present
in /var/cache/apt/arhives ? Or using the script smxi?
The purpose
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:51:20AM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was heard
to say:
The package is flightgear, the Flight Gear Flight simulator.
I installed flightgear on my computer overnight to test this myself,
and it does appear to go into
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Bret Busby b...@busby.net wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:51:20AM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was
heard to say:
The package is flightgear, the Flight Gear Flight simulator.
I installed flightgear on my
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:40:25AM +0900, Bret Busby wrote:
--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..
I noticed your sig did not render correctly in my mailer. The deliniter
for a sig is --spacereturn not --return
So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know
[Lisi] The reason that there is currently a little bit of confusion on
websites
is that the shunt Squeeze - testing, Lenny - stable, Etch - old
stable and Sarge - somewhere-off-the-cliff only happened less than 3
weeks ago on 14th February. The websites are being updated in roughly
order of
n Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:57:48PM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was heard
to say:
I did say, in the intitial posting, at the start of the thread, that I
am running Debian 4.0.
Yeah, I think that I just forgot.
I had not realised that it is now regarded as obsolete.
It's regarded as
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:57:48 +0900, Bret Busby wrote:
I had delayed upgrading to Debian 5.0, as people appear to still have
problems with upgrading to Debian 5.0, so I thought that it would be
better to wait until things had settled, with Debian 5.0, perhaps, when
release 2 appears, or
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:57:48PM +0900, Bret Busby wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:16:31AM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was
heard to say:
b...@bretnewworkstation:~$ cat
/usr/share/applications/flightgear.desktop
cat:
So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer means.
- Deep Thought,
Being a fan of Adams myself, I gave a bit of thought to your sig lines.
You may want to investigate Chapter 3 from the Debian FAQ:
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-choosing.en.html#s3.1
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Thorny wrote:
So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer means.
- Deep Thought,
Being a fan of Adams myself, I gave a bit of thought to your sig lines.
You may want to investigate Chapter 3 from the Debian FAQ:
On Thursday 05 March 2009 15:40:25 Bret Busby wrote:
I am hesitant about trying to make changes to this system,
which includes being wary of upgrading to Debian 5.0, until the ripples
on the list about Debian 5.0, have settled.
There is no need to change at all if you are not happy to do so.
On Thursday 05 March 2009 00:57:48 Bret Busby wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:16:31AM +0900, Bret Busby
b...@busby.net was heard to say:
That's the package from etch, which is now obsolete.
I think he meant the package was obsolete, which is not
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 03:57:18 Bret Busby wrote:
Perhaps, it is due to the categorizing of the games, within the KDE
applications menu, and it was not sure which subcategory of Games, was
applicable?
Possibly - but I have always understood that its function is specifically to
look for
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 03:57:18 Bret Busby wrote:
Perhaps, it is due to the categorizing of the games, within the KDE
applications menu, and it was not sure which subcategory of Games, was
applicable?
Possibly - but I have always understood that its
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:51:20AM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was heard
to say:
The package is flightgear, the Flight Gear Flight simulator.
I installed flightgear on my computer overnight to test this myself,
and it does appear to go into the Gnome menu, under
Applications - Games.
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:51:20AM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was heard
to say:
The package is flightgear, the Flight Gear Flight simulator.
I installed flightgear on my computer overnight to test this myself,
and it does appear to go into
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:16:31AM +0900, Bret Busby wrote:
From history in Synaptic;
Commit Log for Mon Mar 2 13:41:22 2009
Installed the following packages:
fgfs-base (0.9.10-1)
flightgear (0.9.10-2)
freeglut3 (2.4.0-5)
libalut0 (1.0.1-1)
libopenal0a (1:0.0.8-4)
plib1.8.4c2
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:16:31AM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was heard
to say:
b...@bretnewworkstation:~$ cat
/usr/share/applications/flightgear.desktop
cat: /usr/share/applications/flightgear.desktop: No such file or
directory
Looks like you don't have that file at all.
From
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Eric Gerlach wrote:
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:40:51 -0500
From: Eric Gerlach egerl...@feds.uwaterloo.ca
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Adding installed packages to menu
Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:41:22 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:16:31AM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was heard
to say:
b...@bretnewworkstation:~$ cat
/usr/share/applications/flightgear.desktop
cat: /usr/share/applications/flightgear.desktop: No such file or
directory
Looks like
Also, I had (apparently, completely wrongly) understood that, when
installing a package with Synaptic, it was the role of Synaptic, as the
package manager, to ensure that the package was added to the relevant
menu, in the Applications menu hierarchy.
As I mentioned previously, not every sys
of applications), have the same
developers/maintainers, for all distributions, with possibly different
developers working on different version numbers of the applications?
Perhaps, a convenient solution, to whether newly installed packages
should be automatically added to the Applicatopons menu
one ;) ).
The Kubuntu derivative of Ubuntu is blue. :-) Of course, it doesn't have
Gnome by default.
Perhaps, a convenient solution, to whether newly installed packages should
be automatically added to the Applicatopons menu hierarchy, would be that,
when an extra package is installed
Yes; each workstation installation that we have, whilst it has more than
one user account, is used by only one person at a time, and is primarily a
single-user system (but, I really don't like the pseudo thingy that Ubuntu
uses, rather than having a root account. I much prefer having a root
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:41:06PM +0900, Bret Busby b...@busby.net was heard
to say:
It would seem logical, given one point of view, but as I mentioned
previously, that's not the behaviour that I desire from a package manager
any more than I want a link to the executable binary automagically
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 15:49:02 Daniel Burrows wrote:
it looks like in Gnome, I can right-click on Applications
and pick Edit Menus, and choose whether or not various menu items
appear.
In KDE, I just run kappfinder. Then tick (check) the things that I want added
to the menu, and click
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 15:49:02 Daniel Burrows wrote:
it looks like in Gnome, I can right-click on Applications
and pick Edit Menus, and choose whether or not various menu items
appear.
In KDE, I just run kappfinder. Then tick (check) the things that
On Monday 02 March 2009 06:26:33 Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
I am using Debian 4.0.
How do I add installed packages to the Applications menu hierarchy?
Which version of which desktop environment? (Or window maker.)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 06:26:33 Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
I am using Debian 4.0.
How do I add installed packages to the Applications menu hierarchy?
Which version of which desktop environment? (Or window maker.)
Lisi
GDM 2.16.4-1 is the GNOME
On Monday 02 March 2009 10:16:58 Bret Busby wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 06:26:33 Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
I am using Debian 4.0.
How do I add installed packages to the Applications menu hierarchy?
Which version of which desktop environment
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 15:26:33 +0900, Bret Busby (b...@busby.net) wrote:
Hello.
I am using Debian 4.0.
How do I add installed packages to the Applications menu hierarchy?
Try typing update-menus at the command line prompt and see if that
helps.
--
Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:26:33 +0900, Bret Busby wrote:
Synaptic installs then loses packages; it downloads and installs a package
and its dependencies, and then, when queried, it shows the package and its
dependancies to be installed, but it does not add the packages to the
menu, and, in the
101 - 200 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
