On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 04:40:05PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:33:19PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
...
> > To be serious again, what's really lacking to get headless machines
> > to fully work is lack of support in most (all?) BIOS'ses to use a
> > serial line instead of dir
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:33:19PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:10:54AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> ...
> > headless would be a monitor, keyboard and mouse, with no cpu
> > box.
>
> Not quit. Headless would be without monitor, cpu and memory.
> Lack of cpu and memo
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:10:54AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
...
> headless would be a monitor, keyboard and mouse, with no cpu
> box.
Not quit. Headless would be without monitor, cpu and memory.
Lack of cpu and memory could be called brainless, but lack of cpu
alone lacks any resemblance with
> -Original Message-
> From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Installing on a FACELESS pc?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 04:52:09PM -0800, Jay wrote:
> > Headless???
&g
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 04:52:09PM -0800, Jay wrote:
> Headless???
>
> What part of the machine constitute the 'head'?
they mean "faceless" of course. no video/monitor driven from the
machine. instead, you can use the serial port if you know the
voodoo required.
headless would be a monitor, keyb
5 matches
Mail list logo